I wrote: I suppose that could be a tab in the user's Subscription page for that group instead. That might make for a more natural landing page after the user clicks the Request button. It seems like

There is no reference to subgroups here and I seem to recall a recent change to allow members invited to join a subgroup to be automatically added to the main group. Is that route in covered by this

Sharon, Can you cite (or better, screenshot) an example? I'm looking around and not seeing what you describe, though it may be right in front of me. Shal

Mark, Both of those seem problematic to me. If you go the route of payment before approval I think the refund if rejected would have to be automatic - not subject to the group admin's volition. But I

Hi All, I'm working to finish up the new feature that will allow group owners to charge subscriptions or ask for donations of their members. I have a question about how the flow should go for someone

<<This page might be more aptly titled ‘recent activity.’>> ya, that change is what I had previously suggested!! The obvious answer, though maybe impractical or impossible, is for the feed to

The Groups.io menus are less visually noticeable than they could be. The content on the page contains lots of blue and white space, various symbols ( [ … etc. The menus are gray and the text

Is that a reference to the View All option? I'm not sure how you would augment it; I am just thinking about something (anything?) that would advise users that the Active Topic list might well not be

I would favor an augmented version but only if the increased number is user-customizable by group. Otherwise, the problem of having to scroll through a large area for a group or groups one may have

Chris, Perhaps you are arguing for an augmented version of the All Topics display instead? Thanks, Mark

I like “off list” but it might not be clear that if it is off-list, who it is going to. “Reply to sender off-list” is the clearest. Private does sound like “secret.” Some communicated

Or the user could customize that number. The real issue, I think, is that this feed is not a real feed. A real feed is infinite. This page might be more aptly titled ‘recent activity.’ --

Hi All, Well that was fun. Here's what I know right now. At 8:28am pacific time, one of the back end machines appeared to freeze up in a weird way. This machine takes all changes to the main database

In truth neither do I! One option might be to increase the number of "Active" topics listed, although the cut - off point will still be a bit arbitrary; on the face of it 10 doesn't seem excessive

Mark, the only thing I am used to seeing when people use "reply to sender" is them adding "off-list" to the subjectline. I'm not aware of any custom adding "DM", and "private" SOUNDS like it's

Very good point. It still being there is not what saves this situation, though. It's that it's still there but clickless - in other words, as you say here: That was not the case prior to the change..

That's a really good point, and something that had been unconsciously bothering me. I know there are a few really active topics in my group that have failed to appear. I don't know what the solution

By all of the "hate" comments, it almost seems that users are not aware that the initial landing page is still there and has not been changed or removed. This is just a new view, feel free not to use

Having looked a bit more at the Feed page I find myself wondering if there is an inherent limitation as it currently stands; I have started a new topic rather than bolt this on to a thread that is

LOL! Train that puppy. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu