|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
J,
Ok, got it. I think.
Earlier I misunderstood your objection as being a concern that Groups.io would require members to pay for their memberships. Hence my responses about it actually being
J,
Ok, got it. I think.
Earlier I misunderstood your objection as being a concern that Groups.io would require members to pay for their memberships. Hence my responses about it actually being
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#27791
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
There’s another potential problem with groups.io charging members directly (in any proposal, Samuels or otherwise) and that is pet (or even human) health groups where medical issues are discussed.
There’s another potential problem with groups.io charging members directly (in any proposal, Samuels or otherwise) and that is pet (or even human) health groups where medical issues are discussed.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27790
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
We run a non-profit organization which provides socialization opportunities for people with a secret alternative lifestyle. You could think of this as a secret society for those who are not "out" yet
We run a non-profit organization which provides socialization opportunities for people with a secret alternative lifestyle. You could think of this as a secret society for those who are not "out" yet
|
By
Joanie
·
#27789
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
As I said, maybe it could be enhanced.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond
As I said, maybe it could be enhanced.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27788
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
And I am fine with Mark’s original plan, which I said as the first responder in his thread and have reaffirmed ever since. I have been responding in THIS thread to Mark’s *explicit request* for
And I am fine with Mark’s original plan, which I said as the first responder in his thread and have reaffirmed ever since. I have been responding in THIS thread to Mark’s *explicit request* for
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27787
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
But not on Basic groups. The method being discussed allows anyone to 'buy-in' to support GIO, owner or not, but IS NOT required.
I maybe wrong, and Mark should correct me if I am, but the new pricing
But not on Basic groups. The method being discussed allows anyone to 'buy-in' to support GIO, owner or not, but IS NOT required.
I maybe wrong, and Mark should correct me if I am, but the new pricing
|
By
Duane
·
#27786
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Calendar Add/Edit Reminder issues
#suggestion
#bug
No. Anything less than 1 minute before the event is ignored.
Mark
No. Anything less than 1 minute before the event is ignored.
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#27785
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
Since people are contacting me offlist now, I've been forced out from under my rock again and am going to answer: I don't see Samuel's proposal in any way equivalent to the Meetup situation or any
Since people are contacting me offlist now, I've been forced out from under my rock again and am going to answer: I don't see Samuel's proposal in any way equivalent to the Meetup situation or any
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27784
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
If you have a 'number of members' based charging scheme, then members become a cost, that someone has to pay.
In Mark's original scheme, this would fall solely on group owners. Some will be happy
If you have a 'number of members' based charging scheme, then members become a cost, that someone has to pay.
In Mark's original scheme, this would fall solely on group owners. Some will be happy
|
By
Jeremy H
·
#27783
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Calendar Add/Edit Reminder issues
#suggestion
#bug
Surely a '0 minutes before' #cal-reminder is actually a #cal-notice! :-)
Andy
Surely a '0 minutes before' #cal-reminder is actually a #cal-notice! :-)
Andy
|
By
Andy Wedge
·
#27782
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Calendar Add/Edit Reminder issues
#suggestion
#bug
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the quick response!
One question, just to clarify;
>>> This has been fixed. Setting a negative time results in the reminder being ignored.
So a 0-minutes before reminder still is
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the quick response!
One question, just to clarify;
>>> This has been fixed. Setting a negative time results in the reminder being ignored.
So a 0-minutes before reminder still is
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#27781
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Calendar Add/Edit Reminder issues
#suggestion
#bug
This has been fixed. Setting a negative time results in the reminder being ignored.
I've made the changes. Thanks for the clear, illustrated suggestion!
Mark
This has been fixed. Setting a negative time results in the reminder being ignored.
I've made the changes. Thanks for the clear, illustrated suggestion!
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#27780
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
I'm going to unfollow again now.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
I'm going to unfollow again now.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27779
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
Yes. As I've said (frequently;), Mark's original proposal was fine with me even if it needs some tweaking as to amounts and/or limits.
Yes because that's what THIS thread is about.
I see the two
Yes. As I've said (frequently;), Mark's original proposal was fine with me even if it needs some tweaking as to amounts and/or limits.
Yes because that's what THIS thread is about.
I see the two
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27778
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
I see from this that Autofollow Replies takes precedence over Mute This Topic lol.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for
I see from this that Autofollow Replies takes precedence over Mute This Topic lol.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27777
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
J,
That sounds exactly like the situation under Mark's original proposal, plus a mechanism for voluntary payments by members (which I and others suggested).
In the context of this topic I think what
J,
That sounds exactly like the situation under Mark's original proposal, plus a mechanism for voluntary payments by members (which I and others suggested).
In the context of this topic I think what
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#27776
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Pricing/Availability for mobile app
#misc
Duane, thanks for the pointer to the app release info.
Sandi,
I would like to keep in touch and see what you find out. You can send me private email at joanie.m.nightingale if you like. I've got a
Duane, thanks for the pointer to the app release info.
Sandi,
I would like to keep in touch and see what you find out. You can send me private email at joanie.m.nightingale if you like. I've got a
|
By
Joanie
·
#27775
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
Another day, another thought. The closest situation to groups.io that I can think of is Meetup. A couple of years ago Meetup, which was formerly free, started to charge group owners a yearly fee. It
Another day, another thought. The closest situation to groups.io that I can think of is Meetup. A couple of years ago Meetup, which was formerly free, started to charge group owners a yearly fee. It
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#27774
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
That's already covered in the new pricing structure that goes into effect on the 18th, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/27191
This topic is about the possibility of individual members sharing the
That's already covered in the new pricing structure that goes into effect on the 18th, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/27191
This topic is about the possibility of individual members sharing the
|
By
Duane
·
#27773
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
I own a number of groups, the larger one is just about 5000 users. All hobby-related, some have been in existence for nearly 20 years. I can't see the group membership not falling drastically if
I own a number of groups, the larger one is just about 5000 users. All hobby-related, some have been in existence for nearly 20 years. I can't see the group membership not falling drastically if
|
By
Paul Kanevsky
·
#27772
·
|