Yes, the notion of it being a premium is a good one. I personally think it would be a big time saver for a reasonable segment of group owners. Best, Glenn --

It's kinda like the existing Slack integration, but in reverse, using the CSV file as the go-between. I would like to have such a feature, as I have similar circumstances. Having said that, upon

A conversation about whether or not betting is helpful is equally useless. Not at all. I have zero opinion on this and no stake whatsoever in it. I wanted to mention that it would have to be a premium

I guess I just don't find betting helpful in context since it shades toward arguing (against, in your case) and seems to carry a note of discouragement to those proposing new features.

I'm not arguing for or against the feature (which Mark has tried to limit here), but simply making a bet that he won't do it. Of course it's his decision! Implementation is always Mark's decision.

I would leave likelihood to Mark, no? But yes, it would absolutely be a premium feature. I think that is a good thing in that when one has a software service at multiple levels, the

This seems unlikely to be implemented. But if it were, you would at minimum have to have a premium group, because this is essentially direct-adding members. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

Here the situation for several of the groups I run: in order to be able to join the group, the person must be a member of a particular organization (which one varies by group, of course) and

Could Files also have permalinks? Might that allow images original placed in the Files area to be moved to Photos? Dano

Bruce, Agreed (see my earlier post in this topic). Also, a related topic in GMF, Moving pictures, caused me to realize that the Permalink to a photo ought to be independent of album. That way the

The query string seems to reflect sort order, number of items to display per page (from your account settings), and what number the photo would appear if that sort were applied. Such an approach may

Damn, he's too fast for us, even when he's on vacation! :-) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Looks like Mark may have changed something already. The URL now has some extra stuff at the end, starting with ?p= then Created/Name/Taken then more stuff and that seems to find the correct

Did that, got same (correct) photo. I can't reproduce this. ????? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be

Copy the URL for a photo to the clipboard, then change the sort order of the album. The URL will take you to a different photo based on the new sort order. Duane

I just tested this and I don't see any problem with the URL to a photo. It still works for me. ????? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound

Thanks for that suggestion, Gerald. I tried it with Windows 10 Edge and it works, although it brings me to the isolated photo as if I had downloaded it. It will give people quick access to the photo,

Photo ownership can be reassigned, Files currently cannot as far as I can see. Go to the photo in question and click on Edit. One of the headings is Owner, with a drop - down arrow at the right hand

Annick, I agree that the current situation is not good and is in definite need of major improvement. Using the Chrome browser, after I select an image, I can right click the Download button and select

I agree with this. It's something that I'm sure a lot of folks would use. I wonder if it would need to be done at the same time as dealing with the ability to move folders and files between the Group