I don't see how that could work. If they can see the table, they can always do screen captures. A little more work, but they've still got all the information. Duane

On 21/12/2020 15:30, Peter Cook wrote:> So my request is to have the option in the Permissions section of a table to disallow anyone other than the table owner, the groups owner, and/or the group

I use plus addresses (e.g. "foo+maillists.groups.io@...") for my subscriptions. When messages are bouncing, I get a request URI which does not escape the "+",server side translates this to whitespace

One of my groups is limited to the residents of my community. It contains database that is an opt-in directory of residents, including some who are actually group members. (It's a holdover from the

Thank you, Mark. And as merry a Christmas to you as you can manage, Ellen

I've had two reports of issues with the promotion from the Waitlist to Attending recently - both on the same event. This is a small event with a limit of 10 people. Most are singles, but a few are

That is correct. Your groups would be considered legacy and nothing would change. Thanks, Mark

Addendum from Ellen: are all three of my lists added together or are they counted separately? If added together, I could delete 18thCenturyWorlds which has very little traffic. I would regret

I believe Groups.io is an important resource for our society. How about considering becoming a non-profit and asking for donations similar to what Wikipedia does to fill in the shortfall, at least

Something about this level popped into my head this morning. Would there be a possibility of a fee for additional users (Basic+?) at this level? Say $5/mo per each 500 or 1000 additional members?

Just to be clear: I own/moderate 3 lists, one is 234 members (Trollope&Peers), another, 148 (18thCenturyWorlds), the third, 133 (WomenWriters, femnist); we began March 2002; we have no special

As Dilbert once said "Industry standard" roughly equates to "average" I am a member of many groups that offer peer support for users of a particular price of free software or are enthusiasts about a

ken, I don't believe these are targets. Merely the number that are included in the base price of the plan. Again I don't think that's what is intended. There's no reason a group of 2000 members

TechSoup does the verification legwork and maintains a file copy of the IRS determination letter. Tech Soup is a company that handles the verification process for small US based business as well as

I think Mark is smart enough to figure out how to set his charges. I just think he needs to see how many different TYPES of groups there are. Some types can easily bear charges, some not so easy..

Mark, thank you for finding a way at this time to grant legacy groups a free service. I volunteer for a few GIO groups covered personally with the current grandfathered option and I know first hand

I think 2020 will mark the beginning of the great free online services shakeout. The services aren't free and the current methods of paying for them are all pretty flaky: selling ads that most people

I would be extremely opposed, as I was the last time around, to groups having to state on their home page whether they're premium or basic. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

What does the new pricing structure have to do with the members of a group needing to be informed of whether the group is basic or premium or whatever? Nothing. Maybe you are thinking about the

Now that the pricing structure is radically changing to a fee per member. I feel that the Home page should be changed to show if a list is Basic (Free), Premium or Enterprise. Mark has not indicated