Maybe. But this doesn’t help my group members and doesn’t explain why it comes out fine in gmail. It’s invisible after the Word doc is created, edited, and otherwise futzed with until the member

Hi J, It is a Microsoft Word idiosyncrasy. When you press Enter Microsoft Word thinks you want to create a new paragraph. It's the (IMO) stupid default behavior to then put a gap between the two

shal Ok, I could accept that - except that gio uses message and post interchangeably, Posts by members is a noun (not an action - ie, verb) some number of (1 to ?) messages displayed. Now, if the

Bruce, I see. The simplest solution I can think of would be to continue including image files as files in that folder. That would mean exempting them from control by the "Allow Photos In Files"

Post v message Don't care -- Consistency is my point. - which keeps getting conflated with arguments over one personal preference versus another. That said, I agree POST is more better.

Shal -- I didn't take it that way. I guess to fully explain myself I should start at the beginning. There have been many complaints over time about sig-line images and so on proliferating in the

J, Sorry about that. But what's important is that Mark will (hopefully). Short version: Groups.io's web view seems to be ignoring some of the HTML parameters that tell it how much space to put

Bruce, I didn't mean to imply that it would be any less capable than the existing page, when seen by moderators. That would be one difference with an Emailed Files folder - it would be visible to

Shal, thanks but I don't know what you're talking about. LOL. Yeah, I saw that the emailed version of the message came out fine. The problem is that people often compose long, detailed messages in my

J, Interesting. I see what you mean on the web interface, but in Thunderbird and in Gmail's web interface it came out as you probably expected: So

The main thing that's keeping me from going there is that the "View attachments" page is currently the only means available to delete little sig line images and so on that may be accumulating behind

I would like to offer this as an add-on for pasting improvements needed. Please allow pasting an image into a "post" online. -- Gerald

i make this request not only because of my ill-fated limerick this morning, which I copy/pasted from a Word doc, and which appeared here with extra line spaces, but because the problem occurs

Bruce, I would say "yes", with the possibility of leaving the link behind on the Upgrade/Billing page, updated to point to this new folder. Shal

darn formatting came out all wrong! :-( -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond

According to Marv, let’s use “post” And make the word “message” a ghost. When shooting the breeze, Don’t “message me” please Or screen real estate will be toast. -- J Messages are

Memory, storage, processor cycles, and bandwidth are all cheaper than dirt compared to the last century. But screen real estate in these days of pocket computers, is still precious. "Post" is shorter

It would be handy to have a system-created "Emailed Files" folder from which non-image message attachments can be more readily examined. I envision the controls to be similar to what's available in

Technotronic Dimensions, Recall that this test is only applied to messages posted by email that lack the customary "In-Reply-To:" or "References:" header field. That should be a minority case in

Thanks for your hard work Chris in your evaluation and testing, I dont see anything being left out and you built on my original findings quite more than my efforts, which was my intent that someone