|
locked
Re: fees
Is there a way we can discuss issues w/o it turning into pi$$ing matches and turning into a locked topic so that it shuts down conversation? Is it possible that we can act as adults.
Is there a way we can discuss issues w/o it turning into pi$$ing matches and turning into a locked topic so that it shuts down conversation? Is it possible that we can act as adults.
|
By
KWKloeber
·
#22747
·
|
|
locked
Re: categorisation
Well, objectively, you can't call something wholly unnecessary when there are many thousands of of groups to get through.
The search function is fine if you are on rails and know what you want to
Well, objectively, you can't call something wholly unnecessary when there are many thousands of of groups to get through.
The search function is fine if you are on rails and know what you want to
|
By
Ant No
·
#22746
·
|
|
locked
Re: fees
You're forcing me to discuss this here against my wishes.
Defend your assertion of false information.
You're forcing me to discuss this here against my wishes.
Defend your assertion of false information.
|
By
Ant No
·
#22744
·
|
|
moderated
Re: email privacy
Hello Ellen
In an ideal world you are of course correct.
In this world data is harvested for profit which leads to spam and an undesirable level of covert surveillance.
For this reason Europe has
Hello Ellen
In an ideal world you are of course correct.
In this world data is harvested for profit which leads to spam and an undesirable level of covert surveillance.
For this reason Europe has
|
By
Ant No
·
#22743
·
|
|
moderated
OT: requesting special notices from Mark
I had to go special-notice because of the power blackout (need to limit phone usage due to battery life and no internet). Mark, if there are any genetal system messages you want everybody to get, it
I had to go special-notice because of the power blackout (need to limit phone usage due to battery life and no internet). Mark, if there are any genetal system messages you want everybody to get, it
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#22742
·
|
|
locked
Re: fees
I've contacted you privately as this was intended just for Mark.
Deleting it now would suggest I don't stand by my perspective. I do.
Ant👣
I've contacted you privately as this was intended just for Mark.
Deleting it now would suggest I don't stand by my perspective. I do.
Ant👣
|
By
Ant No
·
#22740
·
|
|
moderated
Re: email privacy
Is it true that members of a list cannot see the whole email of other members? As list"owner" (moderator), I can see emails of everyone. I would personally prefer everyone to be able to see one
Is it true that members of a list cannot see the whole email of other members? As list"owner" (moderator), I can see emails of everyone. I would personally prefer everyone to be able to see one
|
By
Ellen Moody
·
#22739
·
|
|
moderated
Re: email privacy
I agree Chris but remember that at the moment owners are trying to rescue a cat from a burning building and IT may not be their forte.
The data Holder, ie groups.io, has a data privacy obligation in
I agree Chris but remember that at the moment owners are trying to rescue a cat from a burning building and IT may not be their forte.
The data Holder, ie groups.io, has a data privacy obligation in
|
By
Ant No
·
#22738
·
|
|
locked
Re: categorisation
I disagree as well. . . categorizing groups is wholly unnecessary and too limiting.
This is why there is a search query. It is not unreasonable for users to review search pulls to find points of
I disagree as well. . . categorizing groups is wholly unnecessary and too limiting.
This is why there is a search query. It is not unreasonable for users to review search pulls to find points of
|
By
RCardona
·
#22736
·
|
|
locked
Re: categorisation
Thank you Duane.
I will read that.
In advance I would point out that the sudden increase in size of the groups list is an important new variable.
Thank you Duane.
I will read that.
In advance I would point out that the sudden increase in size of the groups list is an important new variable.
|
By
Ant No
·
#22735
·
|
|
locked
Re: categorisation
Hello Rich
You seem to miss the point being made.
No one wants to pigeonhole you. Rather enable you to find all the different groups that might interest your eclectic self.
A group not fitting any of
Hello Rich
You seem to miss the point being made.
No one wants to pigeonhole you. Rather enable you to find all the different groups that might interest your eclectic self.
A group not fitting any of
|
By
Ant No
·
#22734
·
|
|
locked
fees
You don't have to post this Mark, I've just learned your name as I've read around a bit more, I know my posts are currently moderated and you closed the last fee thread for good reason.
As feedback,
You don't have to post this Mark, I've just learned your name as I've read around a bit more, I know my posts are currently moderated and you closed the last fee thread for good reason.
As feedback,
|
By
Ant No
·
#22733
·
|
|
moderated
Narrow formatting in Digests?
I started this on GMF and folks suggested it would be better here.
groups.io seems very nice so far except for one thing: Digests are formatted in silly narrow columns. WebTV is long dead; why would
I started this on GMF and folks suggested it would be better here.
groups.io seems very nice so far except for one thing: Digests are formatted in silly narrow columns. WebTV is long dead; why would
|
By
Phil Smith III
·
#22732
·
|
|
moderated
Re: email privacy
Well Duane's post has pointed him or her in the right direction. It might be worth pointing out that Member Directory does not show subscribers' email addresses; it is Members Visible that is the
Well Duane's post has pointed him or her in the right direction. It might be worth pointing out that Member Directory does not show subscribers' email addresses; it is Members Visible that is the
|
By
Chris Jones
·
#22731
·
|
|
locked
Re: categorisation
Something similar was discussed long ago, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/16659342 and https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/16659594
Duane
Something similar was discussed long ago, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/16659342 and https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/16659594
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#22730
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Direct Add
Please read the Sticky Wiki at the top of the page, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topics
Duane
Please read the Sticky Wiki at the top of the page, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topics
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#22729
·
|
|
moderated
Re: email privacy
The group owner can change whether the Member list is available to everyone on the Settings page, Privacy, Members Visible. I believe this is set to Owner by default, so it was turned on somewhere
The group owner can change whether the Member list is available to everyone on the Settings page, Privacy, Members Visible. I believe this is set to Owner by default, so it was turned on somewhere
|
By
Duane
·
#22728
·
|
|
locked
Re: categorisation
I’m not in favor of this.
I’m an amateur radio operator that’s also a railfan, and of course I have an interest in computers and electronics (as I’m sure many ham’s do). Plus I moderate a
I’m not in favor of this.
I’m an amateur radio operator that’s also a railfan, and of course I have an interest in computers and electronics (as I’m sure many ham’s do). Plus I moderate a
|
By
rich hurd
·
#22727
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Direct Add
Direct add limit is just a pause. Depending on the work load, rest get released within minutes or couple of hours. It is a mechanism to control spam. I have added a list more than 1000 by direct add
Direct add limit is just a pause. Depending on the work load, rest get released within minutes or couple of hours. It is a mechanism to control spam. I have added a list more than 1000 by direct add
|
By
M K Ramadoss
·
#22726
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Is this Forum the best place to get updates about the YahooGroups Apocalypse Migration?
Couldn't you automate that second step to make a single step process which saves you some labour and time? Assuming the servers are in place to carry the load.
Couldn't you automate that second step to make a single step process which saves you some labour and time? Assuming the servers are in place to carry the load.
|
By
Ant No
·
#22725
·
|