>>> ... But if we click on view/reply online, there should not be a reply box automatically opened. We can do that for ourselves once online by clicking the reply button.

Hi. I am a lurker here, never post. Always interesting to me to see the discussions. On the group I moderate, this subject of rules comes up often. Almost always brought up by someone who is

Mark, I had to look it up to see why it would be a problem. Personally, I don't see it as a problem. Anyone who doesn't want to be here is welcome to leave. You and I don't really agree politically,

I agree with both of the above. I often want to view online just to see the whole thread together, even though I have no wish to reply. But if we click on view/reply online, there should not be a

And I actually was one of the first to advocate for that at the time. The fact that Mark needs - and highly deserves - to make a living, and a good one, does not really bear on this except possibly as

Experienced users may know to email Support for bugs but the concept of emailing Support, in general, is a recognized way to ask for help and not specifically for reporting bugs. As a newbie, I found

I get the digest and click the "view/reply online" in order to read the topic online. I have to routinely clear multiple blank drafts that have been unknowingly created. While I occasionally "like" a

Why yes it is his prerogative! And he almost immediately closed the thread! 😃 so fortunately there is no need for you to continue to bring up your points! Susan B

Sure, that's HIS prerogative as owner/moderator, and people can contact the mods OFFLIST about such things. My point is that nobody is interested in discussions about whether to have a discussion.

It's not necessarily downloaded with the message. I have Thunderbird set to leave an attachment on the server until I specifically open it. So for me, it takes longer to open an attachment than it

Hello As described here and in subsequent messages: https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/message/26331 When clicking "View/reply online" in a digest, and then clicking "Like", it sometimes causes a

I respect your expressed opinions and would hope to deserve inclusion among those described in your last sentence. But we must not let any "pursuit of perfection” blind us to how very good the

someone making a suggestion is simply that someone making a suggestion, regardless of the type of group they are in.

For little individual desires, for help/support, and possibly for bug fixing, then yes, I agree that people with premium groups should have priority. But as an owner of a premium group, I think I can

I think we need to consider some simple facts. Between group hosting providers NONE seems to have a monopoly on MOST popular “features”. Paid group funds pay ALL Groups.io bills and are the

That is a very good point and one that occurred to me as well. There can be owners of unpaid groups who've been around a long time and are very familiar with the product and capable of making

i think any method that eliminates, or separates, unpaid groups from contributing feature requests is both inefficient and harmful to the desired end result. Are requests from paid groups

Seems to me they're waiting either way. Actually a bit longer for attachments due to the overhead. Either can be done in the background, if wanted. Duane

It's a large file, remember? They have to wait for the download, before they can see it. With an attachment, it is already downloaded.

This is not appropriate for beta. Closing. Mark