|
moderated
Re: Message summary a mess - but not due to IO
I just tested this using a message with several instances of the word "the" and searching on "the." Apparently, search will find and return the first instance of the term, within its context, but only
I just tested this using a message with several instances of the word "the" and searching on "the." Apparently, search will find and return the first instance of the term, within its context, but only
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23538
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Message summary a mess - but not due to IO
The only strange part about this was that it was "fixed" after you restarted your computer. Search looks for instances of your search term within the message body. So if the term occurs more than one
The only strange part about this was that it was "fixed" after you restarted your computer. Search looks for instances of your search term within the message body. So if the term occurs more than one
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23537
·
|
|
moderated
Message summary a mess - but not due to IO
Just an FYI: I just had a strange deal with our group. When you did a search the resulting messages came up with the correct title, but the message summary was taken from bits and pieces within the
Just an FYI: I just had a strange deal with our group. When you did a search the resulting messages came up with the correct title, but the message summary was taken from bits and pieces within the
|
By
Tom Vail
·
#23536
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
Hi Duane,
Yes I updated preferences but ti still stays at only 20. I asked a few members to try it ans its the same thing, it stays at 20 but I can scroll to 100 or infinite.
Maria
Hi Duane,
Yes I updated preferences but ti still stays at only 20. I asked a few members to try it ans its the same thing, it stays at 20 but I can scroll to 100 or infinite.
Maria
|
By
Maria McGrath
·
#23535
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
I have Infinite Scroll on both my admin and test user accounts and I get the same thing. We have an a large database with more than 4K entries and it is very annoying. It is also very annoying that I
I have Infinite Scroll on both my admin and test user accounts and I get the same thing. We have an a large database with more than 4K entries and it is very annoying. It is also very annoying that I
|
By
Jim Wilson
·
#23534
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Premium groups now have more storage, basic group subgroups change
Mark,
I have a group with many subgroups that come and go. I assumed that the subgroup files/photos/whatever were included in the data limit for the main group, but had trouble figuring out how much
Mark,
I have a group with many subgroups that come and go. I assumed that the subgroup files/photos/whatever were included in the data limit for the main group, but had trouble figuring out how much
|
By
Beth Weld
·
#23533
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Premium groups now have more storage, basic group subgroups change
I have no objection to this (I could never really see the use of subgroups).
However, I do believe that a lot of information about Groups.io is not learnt from the Groups.io site but from fans who
I have no objection to this (I could never really see the use of subgroups).
However, I do believe that a lot of information about Groups.io is not learnt from the Groups.io site but from fans who
|
By
Samuel Murrayy
·
#23532
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
I just checked using one of my user level accounts and it works for 20, 50, and 100. Are you sure that you're saving it when you change to another choice?
Duane
I just checked using one of my user level accounts and it works for 20, 50, and 100. Are you sure that you're saving it when you change to another choice?
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#23531
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
I just tried this and it won't work for me either.
I just tried this and it won't work for me either.
|
By
Nancy Funk
·
#23530
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Special Notices
#suggestion
I should have reported this sooner, but the footer was saying whatever I may have set in Advanced Preferences, (i.e. first and followed), not necessarily "all messages..." I hope the bugfix will take
I should have reported this sooner, but the footer was saying whatever I may have set in Advanced Preferences, (i.e. first and followed), not necessarily "all messages..." I hope the bugfix will take
|
By
Duane
·
#23529
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
No, but they do need to scroll down and click Update Preferences or it won't change.
Duane
No, but they do need to scroll down and click Update Preferences or it won't change.
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#23528
·
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site the past few weeks:
BUGFIX: When a poll was created and moderated, if a group moderator edited the poll before approving it, the poll ownership was mistakenly changed to the
Changes to the site the past few weeks:
BUGFIX: When a poll was created and moderated, if a group moderator edited the poll before approving it, the poll ownership was mistakenly changed to the
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23527
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
hi again,
so it works for me BUT it will not work for the members that has tested it.
They changed the items to view to 100 BUT still only see 20 on the database.
Does it have anything to do with me
hi again,
so it works for me BUT it will not work for the members that has tested it.
They changed the items to view to 100 BUT still only see 20 on the database.
Does it have anything to do with me
|
By
Maria McGrath
·
#23526
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Premium groups now have more storage, basic group subgroups change
Any group that is created before Wednesday at 9am pacific time will continue to have the ability to create subgroups, even in basic form, including all the groups that moved over from Yahoo. No
Any group that is created before Wednesday at 9am pacific time will continue to have the ability to create subgroups, even in basic form, including all the groups that moved over from Yahoo. No
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23525
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Premium groups now have more storage, basic group subgroups change
Hi Mark,
You have a one-time surge of Premium Groups created out of the financial realities of the Yahoo meltdown that were promised they could revert to free group status at the end of their original
Hi Mark,
You have a one-time surge of Premium Groups created out of the financial realities of the Yahoo meltdown that were promised they could revert to free group status at the end of their original
|
By
txercoupemuseum.org
·
#23524
·
|
|
moderated
Premium groups now have more storage, basic group subgroups change
Hi All,
Starting now, all premium groups have double the storage, 20GB, up from 10GB. Basic and Enterprise group storage levels are the same as before, at 1GB and 1TB, respectively.
Basic groups
Hi All,
Starting now, all premium groups have double the storage, 20GB, up from 10GB. Basic and Enterprise group storage levels are the same as before, at 1GB and 1TB, respectively.
Basic groups
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23523
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Why not allow Edit w/o resending
Thanks JC and Duane.
The easiest thing for me to do is just (only) post from my
WEBmail hosting servers and hope people limit editing like
the real-time pop-up warning says <grin>.
Don't get me
Thanks JC and Duane.
The easiest thing for me to do is just (only) post from my
WEBmail hosting servers and hope people limit editing like
the real-time pop-up warning says <grin>.
Don't get me
|
By
RickGlaz-WEB <rickglaz4742435@...>
·
#23522
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Why not allow Edit w/o resending
Sometimes a moderator, rather than the member, may edit messages much later, for various reasons.
That said, your statement gives me a couple of ideas that could solve much or all of this. In no
Sometimes a moderator, rather than the member, may edit messages much later, for various reasons.
That said, your statement gives me a couple of ideas that could solve much or all of this. In no
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23521
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More attachment size selections requested
1) We don't track users.
2) If we didn't require a login to access attachments, that would be a rather large security hole for private groups.
Mark
1) We don't track users.
2) If we didn't require a login to access attachments, that would be a rather large security hole for private groups.
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23520
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Why not allow Edit w/o resending
Duane, Thanks. Not what I was expecting. Glad I edit my own stuff sparingly
and generally right away...
Rick
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 06:14 PM, Duane wrote: (that)
Duane, Thanks. Not what I was expecting. Glad I edit my own stuff sparingly
and generally right away...
Rick
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 06:14 PM, Duane wrote: (that)
|
By
RickGlaz-WEB <rickglaz4742435@...>
·
#23519
·
|