I agree that what and how could do with clarifying a bit. Also, don't forget that a member can also change their subscription settings using the Actions button on the Your Groups page. Regardless of

Thank you Mark, you have made my life a little easier. I would think this includes Moderators and Owners, right? Judy F.. Sew it's for Sale GIO SW Florida - USA

Right. There’s the “what” and the “how.” Might be the clearest with them on the same page, with a separator. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy

I actually like that logic a lot better, then separate them into headings or something for better readability, or put a horizontal separator between the two to denote that these are indeed different

There is a feature to Report File by clicking the flag icon next to the filename. It sends a message ("Content flagged as objectionable") from Groups.io to each owner/moderator. We recently saw a

Exactly.-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. I'm not arguing. I'm just explaining why I am right. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Or, something like Delivery = how you get it = individual, digest, or summary. Filter = what you get = none, special notices only, all, following only, following only + first message also, or

I wouldn't throw "replies" into that, unless you're talking about the further filtering (under "following only") by "auto-follow replies." So I'll assume that's what you mean. I would lump "message

Putting all together would be fine. Or separating them into delivery method and filter. I’m with you and would favor having both setting types in one place. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

So, again: email delivery, message selection, and replies all determine which messages get to your inbox. So why not make them all part of the same block of settings?

Thanks. So the whole combination is illogical in addition to misleading grouo members into thinking they’ll receive messages from topics they’re following. The combo serves no function and should

I've tested this and special notices still get delivered. There is no way not to get special notices that I can find when No Email is disabled.

Right. Snd there’s another potential problem with this bad combination, one I haven’t tested yet: theoretically, in a group with “disable no email” set, members could get around this using

But her point is that that's not how it works - if someone is set to Special Notices Only, they get, well, special notices only. If they want more than special notices, they use individual, digest, or

And they would have that. "Following Only" will set them to receive all messages, special notices or otherwise, whose threads they are following, as long as they have any of the other three "delivery

I think that's the wrong way to go about. If people WANT followed threads AND special notices, they should have that option. groetjes/ĝis, Ronaldo

Thinking about this further, I think the problem is one of incorrect or mismatched categorization on the Subscription and Advanced Preferences pages. "Special Notices" is not really an "email delivery

Hi All, I've fixed a few things. If a +owner message doesn't have a subject, the subject is displayed as (No Subject). If you click the Reply button when viewing a +Owner message, the subject is once

I'm calling this a bug because I consider it a bug (an unintended consequence) in the UI. It is currently possible for members of a group to have email delivery set to Special Notices and advanced

Hello, I've changed it so that only moderators can change the ownership of photos. Cheers, Mark