Hi Mark Is there any chance of this being resolved? I run a group that is entirely based on discussion of a Facebook page that we don't seem to be able to view otherwise and the group has been on hold

No, they are in alphabetical order based on the name the group was created as. The list however displays the wording that the owner has chosen as the group's display name. -- Gerald

The order they appear for me seems to based on the historical order of my last visits. The most recent one I visited is on the top. -- Sandi Dickenson ASG Volunteers Group.

I must eat my words. The logo link is even less intuitive than that. It sometimes take you to whatever page you visted previously, e.g. Feed, Your Groups, Topics, etc. Samuel

Yes, that bothers me too. But a little-known secret is that you can get to https://groups.io/groups very easily by simply clicking on the "Groups.io" logo in the top left of the screen. I know it's

At IBM, the response to a bug report where the product didn't perform to user expectations was "Working as Designed," often abbreviated to "WAD." No matter what you do, you're always going to have

It would be helpful to vertically-enlarge the "Your Groups" pull-down menu to account for screen Y-size and allow for more viewable groups and less scrolling: Right now it's

 >>> superfluous or confusing<<< If you think in a logical linear fashion, not at all. A bug isn’t confirmed until Mark receives the email and verifies it’s a bug (or is not.) The prefix

Exactly, so the adjective is either superfluous or confusing, depending on who is using it. It serves no purpose. 😊 -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

>>>On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 07:51 AM, J_Catlady wrote: LOL, I’m not that presumptuous to be certain enough that a “potential” bug, is an “actual” bug.

Drat, faulty memory. Should be "moderator_notes". Duane

While playing with various things the last few days, relative to some questions that have been asked recently, I realized that it would be beneficial to have some additional information included when

For an email address, you could use the term bugreport. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Bug reports in the bug forum could be required to be tagged from a set of defined hashtags that relate to specific features, plus an #other tag. That would help. -- J Messages are the sole opinion

Hashtag, email address, whatever. It’s the qualifier “potential” that’s the problem. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in

I posted in another thread how it would be useful to have a "bug" group. The reason being, I was interested in following their reporting and which ones were being addressed. I had no idea that bugs

Hello I have tested whether a user can join a subgroup directly after responding to an invite, and yes: he can. However, if a user tries to join a subgroup directly via e-mail, Groups.io sends out

Hello In a test, a user who accepted an invitation to a subgroup is told to use the plus-style address for posting to the subgroup (see image attached). This is not ideal. I suspect the template for

>>>On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 04:37 PM, J_Catlady wrote: Ok I can buy into the benefit of a bug-specific forum. (BUT good luck with the above caveat.) Arrrgh.

>>>I don't think a hashtag like that will be effective.<<< In response to Sandi’s comment about both bugs and support questions addressed to <support@>, <potential-bug@> (or whatever@) would be an