hi again, so it works for me BUT it will not work for the members that has tested it. They changed the items to view to 100 BUT still only see 20 on the database. Does it have anything to do with me

Any group that is created before Wednesday at 9am pacific time will continue to have the ability to create subgroups, even in basic form, including all the groups that moved over from Yahoo. No

Hi Mark, You have a one-time surge of Premium Groups created out of the financial realities of the Yahoo meltdown that were promised they could revert to free group status at the end of their original

Hi All, Starting now, all premium groups have double the storage, 20GB, up from 10GB. Basic and Enterprise group storage levels are the same as before, at 1GB and 1TB, respectively. Basic groups

Thanks JC and Duane. The easiest thing for me to do is just (only) post from my WEBmail hosting servers and hope people limit editing like the real-time pop-up warning says <grin>. Don't get me

Sometimes a moderator, rather than the member, may edit messages much later, for various reasons. That said, your statement gives me a couple of ideas that could solve much or all of this. In no

1) We don't track users. 2) If we didn't require a login to access attachments, that would be a rather large security hole for private groups. Mark

Duane, Thanks. Not what I was expecting. Glad I edit my own stuff sparingly and generally right away... Rick On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 06:14 PM, Duane wrote: (that)

Yes, and I have my browser set to delete cookies on every exit, to avoid reduce tracking. A user-friendly email-based group shouldn't require keeping a login active on the host server.

As you point out, whether or not it is already downloaded is a function of settings in the email client. My Thunderbird is set to always download attachments, so there are there when I get to the

I would really like to have Dropbox integration. The google integration doesn't work, and it's got a Dropbox logo, so why not Dropbox? It looks like you had API v1 integration at one

I wanted to expand on why I think it's so important to maintain the posted-date, rather than the edited-date, sort order of messages in the message list. I especially want to contrast this with the

Hi Christos, Eventually, post migration, all the memberswill become unmoderated after four posts, or as I open it up. And the replies come pretty fast after a everyone sees a new Topic. So, I would

Scott, While I also see a value to be able to move a topic with all the associated replies to a subgroup (and also the corollary could also be valuable), I'm curious, when you

I recall it having been raised (perhaps not by you) and debated at length. I've found a couple of prior topics (threads) referring to it but not yet the original. Here's one of

Actually, they don't. They're sorted by the original posting time, so only those on email are really aware that an edit was made. (I believe that those on Digest only get the most recent version

Quite easy actually. Follow the instructions for deleting attachments at https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Deleting%20attachments,%20files%20and%20photos Duane

OTHERS Editing does not affect me (I guess). I mostly read and write on the Group.io site so I don't see older versions unless I dig into the edit logs.... If you "continuously refine" your posts I

You could do as other groups do, such as this one, and disable editing - no more problems. Duane PS This isn't FB - thankfully.

That already exists by clicking on the blue "EDIT" button (with the caveat that moderators have the ability to delete prior revisions in case they contain material requiring deleted for some reason