Mark, Prospective members want to know and judge between lists they will join, partially by member count and use it when they act like BMOC to ellicite a pal to join. Also used to readily note if

I've made this change. Cheers, Mark

Can you give me some more information on why you'd like the number of members on that page? Are you using that as a proxy for something else? That number generally doesn't change much. Thanks, Mark

Hi Mark, I notice the mobile Groups page has changed again. I can see that it shows pending messages and member subscriptions but it's missing the number of members in a group. From an owner/mod point

Hello, I believe this has been discussed in a prior ticket (but I am unable to find) I have a Project who prefers using US Pacific Time for their Groups.io calendar. Unfortunately, after the last time

This morning I arose to see my wish has already been granted! So much easier to look at my inbox now and see at a glance whether I need to log into groups.io immediately to approve pending members or

And one of the disadvantages is getting hashtags created automatically. We have all sorts of innocent messages that happen to have a # in the subject line appearing in our hashtag list. I have just

When we moved over from YG, we welcomed the possibility of turning our old compulsory but often misused message tags in compulsory hashtags and let the system take on some moderation duties. One of

That's not my intent. All things that can be used, can be misused, including existing groups.io features. Limiting features to things that cannot possibly be misused is too high a bar for

Glenn I don't concur with the analogy. You seem to be viewing your suggestion with focus on your needs only. It makes it seem that your pencil analogy disregards the value of any other groups'

I use and like hashtags on my group's messages. I don't need hashtags on group notifications, but I can live with them if necessary (I'll just ignore them). What would be infinitely more useful for

It could be restricted to x number of characters from the file name rather than the entire file name. Patti

No, very strongly no. That change would mean that a mail client that auto-added address book entries would end up with an entry saying: "Malcolm Austen via groups.io" <my personal@address> in their

My groups don't have this problem. In fact, we have a fairly rigid naming pattern. I would not want to see this discarded because there is some possible abuse somewhere. It's like not making

For the vast majority of users 'headers' and 'DMARC requirements' are meaningless terms, just part of the 'magic' that gets their messages through the system, without them having to care what's going

After doing a bit more thorough testing, I've discovered that TB does work properly if using the Reply button. It's the Reply All that will also populate the group name in addition to the sender. TB

Mark, I'd like to maintain a clear semantic and operational distinction between messages, which post to the group's archive and are sent to members in accordance to the Email

Filtering works on content as well as 'Subject'. Given that a lot of people can't restrain themselves with brevity in naming files, it may work out worse than a desirable feature. Regards davew

Mark, What Duane said. I think for Jim's use case it would suffice to remove List-Post when Remove other options is checked. Logically it makes no sense to provide the List-Post field when that is

Not really sure how to interpret radio silence here. Mark, your thoughts would be appreciated, if only so I can provide feedback back to my members saying it was considered. Many thanks