There's already a button labeled Private that lets you send the message to the sender instead of the group. Or am I missing something? Thanks,Mark

The current wording makes it appear as if this was something that the user had initiated and performed, and it would be nice if the wording made it clearer that this was something that was done by the

There are Reply settings with options for reply to: Sender Group Sender and groupWhat I think is needed is an option for Sender OR Group Maybe select a default for one or the other in the

To be a little more specific, it's the time zone you've set, if any. The default is PST/PDT. Duane

Rick -- Dates and times displayed on the web site are adjusted for your own local time zone, while the group export is likely done in whatever groups.io's native time zone is (looks like Pacific time

Also, the bug is the fault of the system, not of email, because in my test I created the topic online, not via email. The system removed the duplicate in the web version of the message, but sends out

In response to Duane, I see nothing about only the online version being fixed. The bug mentioned by the OP still exists in the email version of the messsges. So I’m confused by what you’re saying.

The online indicator was fixed last week. First item on https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/23941 Duane

What do you mean by "the member download"? Samuel

Funny, I saw the double #bug #bug tag on this message in the email but it's not in the web version. I thought at first that maybe Mark deleted the duplicate, but I ran a test and find that this

Bob the suggestion wasn’t meant to be perfect, and I’m sure others could have stated it more clearly the first time virtually any message circulation function could be handled by exchanging

See the subject line. The system should only allow single use of a tag on a subject line.

I just found a member that is shown as joining the group on January 29th, 2020, but in the member download, she is listed as having joined on January 28th, 2020.

Ronaldo no, no, no. No member would be required to pick from hashtags. Merely, if, just say for example, a message was to be sent to only one select group, the members in that group could be in a

Hi Mark, The way the Bouncing Member list management screen works currently, unless if one has anything but maybe 5-6 list entries, if there is a bunch to go though and check the bounce history

After reading the previous original plus 6 replies, I feel we need to identify a few things first. What is Groups.io? It is an entity that provides the ability to build online groups that may also

When setting moderator permissions, the next to last one says: |_| Set Moderator Privileges (also allows access to the member list and allows setting member subscription options) But yet I read in GMF

Hi All, I have a first, rough draft of a group owner's manual. I'd like to get it in front of a couple experienced group owners for feedback: is it going in the right direction, are there any

The Pending Subscription Notification currently reads: "If you do not take action within that time, the pending subscription will be automatically rejected." If the subscription request is simply

Mark, 1. Bad news: this is still not working. I just banned someone using their email address, and their notes are gone in the banned list. 2. There is a further remaining mismatch: the banned list