|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
Mark,
1. Bad news: this is still not working. I just banned someone using their email address, and their notes are gone in the banned list.
2. There is a further remaining mismatch: the banned list
Mark,
1. Bad news: this is still not working. I just banned someone using their email address, and their notes are gone in the banned list.
2. There is a further remaining mismatch: the banned list
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23992
·
|
|
moderated
forcing digests
Does "recent" have a definition?
I always assumed that digests were sent out whenever the oldest message in waiting had been there for 24 hours...or as soon as there were 12 messages in the queue
If
Does "recent" have a definition?
I always assumed that digests were sent out whenever the oldest message in waiting had been there for 24 hours...or as soon as there were 12 messages in the queue
If
|
By
ro-esp
·
#23991
·
|
|
moderated
Re: suggested change to use hashtag to control sending megs
#suggestion
then why send it?
I don't think so. If I send a message to a group, I want it to be forwarded, not bounced back
-- A very busy Nome inside reads
Do you mean gnome?
So any subscriber would have to
then why send it?
I don't think so. If I send a message to a group, I want it to be forwarded, not bounced back
-- A very busy Nome inside reads
Do you mean gnome?
So any subscriber would have to
|
By
ro-esp
·
#23990
·
|
|
moderated
Re: section links
#suggestion
mmm no I mean header in github wiki like “# Header” when exported to html has an anchor added to it : <h1>< a href=“#Header” />Header</h1> So you can link them easily
Benoît
mmm no I mean header in github wiki like “# Header” when exported to html has an anchor added to it : <h1>< a href=“#Header” />Header</h1> So you can link them easily
Benoît
|
By
bchesneau@...
·
#23989
·
|
|
moderated
Re: section links
#suggestion
I too noticed this when looking at https://help.github.com/en/github content.
That is one reason I promote the idea of using a Table of Contents (ToC) for longer pages.
The page you reference uses
I too noticed this when looking at https://help.github.com/en/github content.
That is one reason I promote the idea of using a Table of Contents (ToC) for longer pages.
The page you reference uses
|
By
Bill Hazel
·
#23988
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Problem with sorting in Emailed Photos folder
#bug
#fixed
This should be fixed now.
Thanks,Mark
This should be fixed now.
Thanks,Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23987
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Deleting attachments when out of space
#update
Yes, that's the kind of scenario that I was thinking about.
Perhaps. I'm mildly concerned that the enforcer [insert "hasta la vista, baby" voice here] -- if run before the daily digest compiler/sender
Yes, that's the kind of scenario that I was thinking about.
Perhaps. I'm mildly concerned that the enforcer [insert "hasta la vista, baby" voice here] -- if run before the daily digest compiler/sender
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#23986
·
|
|
moderated
Re: section links
#suggestion
Could you explain what you mean exactly? After all, you can have links (of pretty-much any kind) in Wiki, do you really mean have the ability to hover over a link and turn it into a "preview"
Could you explain what you mean exactly? After all, you can have links (of pretty-much any kind) in Wiki, do you really mean have the ability to hover over a link and turn it into a "preview"
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#23985
·
|
|
moderated
Re: suggested change to use hashtag to control sending megs
#suggestion
Ronaldo,
It means that your email to a group doesn't get delivered directly to members. GIO is an email bounce service -- A very busy Nome inside reads your message and types it out onto another
Ronaldo,
It means that your email to a group doesn't get delivered directly to members. GIO is an email bounce service -- A very busy Nome inside reads your message and types it out onto another
|
By
KWKloeber
·
#23984
·
|
|
moderated
section links
#suggestion
WHile the wiki is said to use the github markdown flavour it's not possible yet to have section links. Would be very useful to have it...
WHile the wiki is said to use the github markdown flavour it's not possible yet to have section links. Would be very useful to have it...
|
By
bchesneau@...
·
#23983
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Deleting attachments when out of space
#update
First, as a word nerd, I need to say that I really appreciate the use of the word bolus.
I haven't yet set up the time for when the enforcer process will run, but I'm not sure I understand your
First, as a word nerd, I need to say that I really appreciate the use of the word bolus.
I haven't yet set up the time for when the enforcer process will run, but I'm not sure I understand your
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23982
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Deleting attachments when out of space
#update
Thanks for the update, Mark. As you might imagine, we're getting some follow-up inquiries in GMF.
If I may, please ensure that the nightly attachment trim is the last function performed in whatever
Thanks for the update, Mark. As you might imagine, we're getting some follow-up inquiries in GMF.
If I may, please ensure that the nightly attachment trim is the last function performed in whatever
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#23981
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
See https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/70062502
Duane
See https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/70062502
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#23980
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Deleting attachments when out of space
#update
I just sent out the two week warning messages.
It will start two weeks from tomorrow.
I will change it so that there will be one log entry per "purge", and it'll list the high water mark message
I just sent out the two week warning messages.
It will start two weeks from tomorrow.
I will change it so that there will be one log entry per "purge", and it'll list the high water mark message
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23979
·
|
|
moderated
Re: suggested change to use hashtag to control sending megs
#suggestion
>>>. But how will you deal with the message list?<<<
J - unsure what you’re asking. Clarify?
>>>. But how will you deal with the message list?<<<
J - unsure what you’re asking. Clarify?
|
By
KWKloeber
·
#23978
·
|
|
moderated
Calendar ICS file changes
#update
Hi All,
I just pushed a big revamp of how we generate calendar ICS files, something I've been working on for the past week. ICS files are the attachments in #cal-invite and #cal-reminder messages and
Hi All,
I just pushed a big revamp of how we generate calendar ICS files, something I've been working on for the past week. ICS files are the attachments in #cal-invite and #cal-reminder messages and
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#23976
·
|
|
moderated
Re: auto-acknowledgement from support is back (yay) but missing original message
#bug
Yep, Duane, has totally forgotten that. Which is ironic, since making MF a group option (in general, not specifically for beta) was actually my suggestion. 😊
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of
Yep, Duane, has totally forgotten that. Which is ironic, since making MF a group option (in general, not specifically for beta) was actually my suggestion. 😊
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23975
·
|
|
moderated
Re: auto-acknowledgement from support is back (yay) but missing original message
#bug
Correction: there’s no delay issue. I’d forgotten that the group is now MF. Also missed Mark’s note that he changed the tag to “bug”.
I need to go off that decaf I started this
Correction: there’s no delay issue. I’d forgotten that the group is now MF. Also missed Mark’s note that he changed the tag to “bug”.
I need to go off that decaf I started this
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23974
·
|
|
moderated
Re: auto-acknowledgement from support is back (yay) but missing original message
#bug
Not that bad considering that all new topics are now moderated per https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/23814
Duane
Not that bad considering that all new topics are now moderated per https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/23814
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#23973
·
|
|
moderated
Re: auto-acknowledgement from support is back (yay) but missing original message
#bug
That message took roughly 10 minutes to appear either online or in email. Maybe the message delay problem is back.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My
That message took roughly 10 minutes to appear either online or in email. Maybe the message delay problem is back.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#23971
·
|