|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Thanks for the sanity check. I remember someone having requested that they be tracked, and tracking bouncing of the probes could indeed be very useful (as I just wrote in the separate thread about
Thanks for the sanity check. I remember someone having requested that they be tracked, and tracking bouncing of the probes could indeed be very useful (as I just wrote in the separate thread about
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24081
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Based on my limited investigation, you're partially correct. The bounces of the probes wasn't logged in the Activity Log, but was logged in the member's Email Delivery History as of July/August last
Based on my limited investigation, you're partially correct. The bounces of the probes wasn't logged in the Activity Log, but was logged in the member's Email Delivery History as of July/August last
|
By
Duane
·
#24080
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Yes, and that's one more reason why you don't need or want further "is bouncing" entries in the group activity log. However, a group activity log entry to the effect that the member is actually
Yes, and that's one more reason why you don't need or want further "is bouncing" entries in the group activity log. However, a group activity log entry to the effect that the member is actually
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24079
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Bounce Probes show up in the individual member's Email Delivery History.
Chris
Bounce Probes show up in the individual member's Email Delivery History.
Chris
|
By
Chris Jones
·
#24078
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Mark,
Sorry for the dribble of thoughts. Things keep occurring to me, but I will stop after this. I think as moderators we do want to know when a bounce probe itself has bounced, so that we can not
Mark,
Sorry for the dribble of thoughts. Things keep occurring to me, but I will stop after this. I think as moderators we do want to know when a bounce probe itself has bounced, so that we can not
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24077
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
John et al,
I'd already started a separate topic for the multiple "is bouncing" entries bug. I just posted an update in it, but I'll repeat quickly here and then move over there from now on: After an
John et al,
I'd already started a separate topic for the multiple "is bouncing" entries bug. I just posted an update in it, but I'll repeat quickly here and then move over there from now on: After an
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24076
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Need for Better Quality Photo Viewing
#done
Charlie, this confirms my experiment above.
The question is, can anybody do anything about the 720x720 downsampling?
There must have been, originally, a reason to do this, I'd guess to do with
Charlie, this confirms my experiment above.
The question is, can anybody do anything about the 720x720 downsampling?
There must have been, originally, a reason to do this, I'd guess to do with
|
By
epiplan
·
#24075
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Need for Better Quality Photo Viewing
#done
Forgot about this with all the holiday stuff.
I will make a simple statement that the same photos on Yahoo were displayed without any issues. It is not the photos. To be precise, I did not
Forgot about this with all the holiday stuff.
I will make a simple statement that the same photos on Yahoo were displayed without any issues. It is not the photos. To be precise, I did not
|
By
Charlie Behnken
·
#24074
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Mark,
The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether the problem lies in the part of the code that handles bounces of bounce probes, rather than the part that handles bounces of group messages.
Mark,
The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether the problem lies in the part of the code that handles bounces of bounce probes, rather than the part that handles bounces of group messages.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24073
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Exactly. It's been very useful in finding these cases.
And yes, as you say, the issue is the contiguous list of bounces, but not recorded as bounces: recorded (erroneously) as bounce-status changes.
Exactly. It's been very useful in finding these cases.
And yes, as you say, the issue is the contiguous list of bounces, but not recorded as bounces: recorded (erroneously) as bounce-status changes.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24072
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
You also certainly do not want a log entry for every message a member bounces. That would be an unholy mess. The “is bouncing” should really only be logged when the account’s status changes to
You also certainly do not want a log entry for every message a member bounces. That would be an unholy mess. The “is bouncing” should really only be logged when the account’s status changes to
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24071
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
ps Rhe reason I say there has been no status change is that there are no intervening entires “x is no longer bouncing.” Granted thst in itself could be a logging bug (I.e., the account did unbound
ps Rhe reason I say there has been no status change is that there are no intervening entires “x is no longer bouncing.” Granted thst in itself could be a logging bug (I.e., the account did unbound
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24070
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
John,
I agree with you on the general principle of the log entry. But I think the problem is with the language of the entry. “X is bouncing” implies a change in status when there has been no
John,
I agree with you on the general principle of the log entry. But I think the problem is with the language of the entry. “X is bouncing” implies a change in status when there has been no
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24069
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Unless I am much mistaken (always possible!) the anomaly is that while the individual member's Email Delivery History appears to be correct the group - wide Activity log can show a contiguous list of
Unless I am much mistaken (always possible!) the anomaly is that while the individual member's Email Delivery History appears to be correct the group - wide Activity log can show a contiguous list of
|
By
Chris Jones
·
#24068
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
It is great that this has been set for a hard bounce. I hate going through the group one by one to inspect the mail history. I have to be honest, I'm still not clear on the anomaly you are referring
It is great that this has been set for a hard bounce. I hate going through the group one by one to inspect the mail history. I have to be honest, I'm still not clear on the anomaly you are referring
|
By
John Pearce
·
#24067
·
|
|
moderated
Missing messages in search
#update
Hi All,
A change I made to the search indexing system last Thursday in an attempt to speed things up had the unfortunate effect of causing some incoming messages to not be indexed. I don't know how
Hi All,
A change I made to the search indexing system last Thursday in an attempt to speed things up had the unfortunate effect of causing some incoming messages to not be indexed. I don't know how
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24066
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Because the conditions back then for setting a member to "bouncing" were not satisfied. You need either a hard bounce, or at least one soft bounce within every consecutive four consecutive days after
Because the conditions back then for setting a member to "bouncing" were not satisfied. You need either a hard bounce, or at least one soft bounce within every consecutive four consecutive days after
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24065
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
I would just like to squeeze in some more data to this topic to
show it is not just related to users with special-notice delivery,
as well as other observations.
For me, the bounce code seems to be
I would just like to squeeze in some more data to this topic to
show it is not just related to users with special-notice delivery,
as well as other observations.
For me, the bounce code seems to be
|
By
JediPirx
·
#24064
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Need for Better Quality Photo Viewing
#done
I'm here a bit late but have the same problem and was referred here by GMF.
Brief description: I have resizing turned OFF for now, and did my own resizing, long side = 2500 pixels before upload to
I'm here a bit late but have the same problem and was referred here by GMF.
Brief description: I have resizing turned OFF for now, and did my own resizing, long side = 2500 pixels before upload to
|
By
epiplan
·
#24063
·
|
|
moderated
group-activity "is bouncing" vs. "bounced" log entries don't match search criterion "bounced"
#bug
This is a more accurate rewrite, this time as a bug, of a #suggestion I just wrote about bouncing/bounced log entry mismatches. Here are the actual problems. (I will either delete the previous
This is a more accurate rewrite, this time as a bug, of a #suggestion I just wrote about bouncing/bounced log entry mismatches. Here are the actual problems. (I will either delete the previous
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24062
·
|