The new home page is still only on beta and a couple other groups. I'd like to roll it out everywhere, but when I proposed that awhile ago, there was ... consternation. I would still like to roll it

Under the heading of "there are no guarantees in life," I'd add that Google has shuttered (or marginalized) well over a hundred services. And some are on life support. If they decide groups doesn't

Hi Andy, My understanding of „new group home page“ is that this change is only applied to new groups - i.e. any groups created from today onwards. I can imagine that some group owners wouldn‘t

The way it reads to me is that the change has been rolled out so that it now looks the same as beta. If it is just a change to beta, I don't see the point on including that on a general release note

No, it doesn't. It says the change was made to "the new group home page" which hasn't been rolled out to any group other than beta. It's available on the beta group so we can see what it looks like

But that's precisely what the changelog says has happened. If it hasn't, why is it in the changelog? Andy

Since June of last year, beta is the only group that has the home page redesign, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/32057590 It hasn't been rolled out to all groups yet. Duane

Hi Mark, I'm seeing no evidence of these changes on my group/subgroups. The homepage(s) look the same as before (they don't look like beta) and I don't see an option to define a new calendar event as

Changes to the site this week: INTERNAL: Improvements to our log file grepping system to help track down problems. NEW: Many updates to the new Help Center, Owners Manual and Members Manual. CHANGE:

I've spent all afternoon trying to track this down, and frustratingly I don't have an answer yet. Something happened to those 7 messages between the times you sent two messages at 9:33pm and 9:49pm

Mark -- I received Digest #1610 for GMF at 10:46 PM EDT last night, containing 12 messages #30894-30905. No problem. This morning at 6 AM, I received Digest #1611 with a single message in it...#30913.

You replied to an old thread and I fail to understand what "like to be ahead on this issue" actually means to you. -- Bob Bellizzi

Well I am already a premium customer and though I am in favour of paying for the service as long as visible support exists, I think it would be slicker with an integrated tables facilities. The

Last fall it was mentioned that large lists would have to upgrade to Premium, based on the number of subscribers. Then the issue was suspended during the YG meltdown. I have several lists considering

Yes! Too true, unfortunately. So pretty low on the scale of things to do I'm sure. Still can with Gmail and Outlook. But those days may be numbered! sigh. Markdown has become the preferred

An update: it turns out I need to have Zoom approve the integration for their marketplace before it can be active (I don't need it to be in their marketplace, but whatever). I hope this will happen in

It's true that I do tweak things, but I try to announce them (I have done a bunch of word tweaks lately in response to tech writer Nina's suggestions that I haven't specifically called out). But this

Thank you Mark!!!

Helps a LOT! Thank you for checking. Is this something that changed "recently"? I seem to remember seeing the HTML editing buttons previously, but maybe I wasn't paying close enough attention (and

Ah, that's it. For groups that are plain text only, we only allow plain text replies. I tested the URL you sent, and it put up the plain text editor, as expected. It wasn't the markdown editor (really