|
moderated
Re: Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
I would appreciate if someone could explain the rationale to me that would make it reasonable for any Moderator to be able to demote any Owner, (or any Moderator senior to them).
Chuck
I would appreciate if someone could explain the rationale to me that would make it reasonable for any Moderator to be able to demote any Owner, (or any Moderator senior to them).
Chuck
|
By
Charles Roberts
·
#24213
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
Incorrect as of now. If that moderator can't give someone else moderator status, it would only last as long as that moderator did - end of group. Many of us don't see it as a "time bomb" since we've
Incorrect as of now. If that moderator can't give someone else moderator status, it would only last as long as that moderator did - end of group. Many of us don't see it as a "time bomb" since we've
|
By
Duane
·
#24212
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
Ronaldo, et al...
There have been numerous opinions contributes here under the above subject, under [beta] "Protecting the original Owner from rogue co-Owners #suggestion”, and under [GMF]
Ronaldo, et al...
There have been numerous opinions contributes here under the above subject, under [beta] "Protecting the original Owner from rogue co-Owners #suggestion”, and under [GMF]
|
By
txercoupemuseum.org
·
#24211
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
What he said!
Chuck
By
Charles Roberts
·
#24210
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
My thought (as expressed on GMF) is that there should be certain 'Owner only' privileges: I would suggest they are (1) the ability to make/unmake owners; (2) the ability to delete or rename their
My thought (as expressed on GMF) is that there should be certain 'Owner only' privileges: I would suggest they are (1) the ability to make/unmake owners; (2) the ability to delete or rename their
|
By
Jeremy H
·
#24209
·
|
|
moderated
Re: log activity when someone responds to a poll
#suggestion
Oh, I think you mean you can edit the poll after people have already voted to show who voted for what. That's pretty bad.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy
Oh, I think you mean you can edit the poll after people have already voted to show who voted for what. That's pretty bad.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24208
·
|
|
moderated
Re: log activity when someone responds to a poll
#suggestion
There's a very LARGE caveat. The poll can be edited so that the information is revealed! That might be considered a bug, or at least an undesired option. Once the "Do not show who responded to the
There's a very LARGE caveat. The poll can be edited so that the information is revealed! That might be considered a bug, or at least an undesired option. Once the "Do not show who responded to the
|
By
Duane
·
#24207
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Default database view
#done
#suggestion
Perhaps, as someone else suggested, truncating HTML columns at a certain height might help.
However, in our particular use case we would like to hide other columns too. We just need to be able to
Perhaps, as someone else suggested, truncating HTML columns at a certain height might help.
However, in our particular use case we would like to hide other columns too. We just need to be able to
|
By
Chris Smith
·
#24206
·
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
INTERNAL: Added additional monitoring of the search cluster.
INTERNAL: Switched over to a new Elasticsearch 7 search cluster. All of this work around search has multiple
Changes to the site this week:
INTERNAL: Added additional monitoring of the search cluster.
INTERNAL: Switched over to a new Elasticsearch 7 search cluster. All of this work around search has multiple
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24205
·
|
|
moderated
Re: log activity when someone responds to a poll
#suggestion
Ok. That’s very good to know. I’ve been wanting to do an anonymous poll in my group but always thought it was not possible.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy
Ok. That’s very good to know. I’ve been wanting to do an anonymous poll in my group but always thought it was not possible.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24204
·
|
|
moderated
Re: log activity when someone responds to a poll
#suggestion
On the two I looked at, not even an owner or poll creator can see who responded, being truly anonymous (except for the hidden record that keeps track of each persons response in case they want to
On the two I looked at, not even an owner or poll creator can see who responded, being truly anonymous (except for the hidden record that keeps track of each persons response in case they want to
|
By
Duane
·
#24203
·
|
|
moderated
Re: log activity when someone responds to a poll
#suggestion
That depends on the answer to "Do not show WHO who responded to the poll"? Does it mean, don't even show the mods? I was under the impression it just meant "don't show the group."
--
J
Messages
That depends on the answer to "Do not show WHO who responded to the poll"? Does it mean, don't even show the mods? I was under the impression it just meant "don't show the group."
--
J
Messages
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24202
·
|
|
moderated
Re: log activity when someone responds to a poll
#suggestion
While researching something else, I realized that if implemented, there should be no logging if the poll is set up for "Do not show who responded to the poll" is chosen.
Duane
While researching something else, I realized that if implemented, there should be no logging if the poll is set up for "Do not show who responded to the poll" is chosen.
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#24201
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add Charter Rules to Wiki
#meta
Oops, I hadn't seen it there. Maybe have the Guidelines sent on join (and every month?), with a "lock immediately" hashtag. Or make a locked post with only the charter and sticky it since the 'help'
Oops, I hadn't seen it there. Maybe have the Guidelines sent on join (and every month?), with a "lock immediately" hashtag. Or make a locked post with only the charter and sticky it since the 'help'
|
By
Duane
·
#24200
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add Charter Rules to Wiki
#meta
That brings up the issue, which occurred to me last night, of what happens when a bug is tagged #fixed by Mark and it turns out not to really be fixed. Does Mark remove the tag? In the cases I've
That brings up the issue, which occurred to me last night, of what happens when a bug is tagged #fixed by Mark and it turns out not to really be fixed. Does Mark remove the tag? In the cases I've
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24199
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add Charter Rules to Wiki
#meta
#fixed and #done are moderator hashtags, not for users. They would be added if/when that state is reached. I do agree that there should be an easy place for others, especially newcomers, to find the
#fixed and #done are moderator hashtags, not for users. They would be added if/when that state is reached. I do agree that there should be an easy place for others, especially newcomers, to find the
|
By
Duane
·
#24198
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add Charter Rules to Wiki
#meta
What??? You don't? Tsk, tsk! :-)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
What??? You don't? Tsk, tsk! :-)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24197
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add Charter Rules to Wiki
#meta
Hear, Hear.
I don’t agree with everything J says, but she obviously thinks before posting and her opinions often worthy of consideration.
WRB
—
Hear, Hear.
I don’t agree with everything J says, but she obviously thinks before posting and her opinions often worthy of consideration.
WRB
—
|
By
txercoupemuseum.org
·
#24196
·
|
|
moderated
App is starting to become accessible
#misc
Hi All,
A lot of work on accessibility was just merged into the app. It's not complete (like the app itself), but many of the screens and menus should be accessible now. If you use a screen reader on
Hi All,
A lot of work on accessibility was just merged into the app. It's not complete (like the app itself), but many of the screens and menus should be accessible now. If you use a screen reader on
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24195
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Add Charter Rules to Wiki
#meta
Unfortunately I have to say "I disagree" with the vast majority (or at least a whole lot) of this. I don't know where it's coming from. It does not seem to be coming from the original "charter" that
Unfortunately I have to say "I disagree" with the vast majority (or at least a whole lot) of this. I don't know where it's coming from. It does not seem to be coming from the original "charter" that
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24194
·
|