If a message is sent by email, the sender wouldn't even know it was being moderated, unless the group has a policy that every message from every sender is moderated.. Some members think that any delay

Mark, I think you mean "remove that column." I recalled suggesting this in the past, and I found the thread: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/1763947#8385 It seems the conclusion (using the term

Mark, Or, convert it to a permalink icon on each row that shows the ID number as a tooltip. Possibly moved to the right as Duane suggested. Preserving its usability as a sorting key to put the rows in

I can work with it either way. Most of the time I don't use it, but it can be handy for seeing which order the items were added in some cases. How about another option, move it to the right side,

Just allow it to be hidden. lloyd lehrer

Hi All, In each database, there is an ID column, assigned automatically, starting from 1 and monotonically increasing for each row. It seems that this column leads to some confusion, especially for

We've verified that the group also can't be created, but doesn't exist. Probably because it was once created, then deleted. If this is the case, I think the error should be "That address is not

That has nothing to do with the issue of allowing members to delete pending messages. It's completely separate. It's the issue Shal recently brought up when he suggested his "claimed" feature for

Valid, but minimal point. If one Moderator/Owner currently starts to moderate a message, are all other Moderators/Owner prevented from doing so? OR If more than one Moderator/Owner currently is

BTW this is mostly true, but it's an apt comparison with groups.io only in the case that messages are moderated and the user can't see their message on the site while it's still pending. (NYT, whose

should read "if posted via web" -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Not bad except for this part. The issue is when a moderator starts to moderate a message first, and then the sender gives the instruction to delete. None of this solves that, which is really the only

Posting via an online form (anywhere) typically fails to provide the option to receive a copy of one's 'sent' message. I try to avoid posting online for that reason A checkbox could offer that

Dave, The reason has to do with the fact that those are mailto links, and they necessarily include the text of the subject line. They'd be sizeable and quite ugly as URLs in plain text. Maybe call

Another thought. Currently plain text versions of group mails do not contain the 'reply to sender' option in the footer, only in the html version if it exists. If this is to be implemented can we

My objection would be that it makes it more difficult for people to reply directly to sender from email. OK, I know there is a 'reply to sender' at the bottom of the mail but many don't see this. I

Hi All, Right now, we munge the From line of messages for people who have DMARC records of p=reject or p=quarantine. We do not do that for people who have DMARC records of p=none. I propose changing

Or maybe the can-of-worms-in-the-sky list.;) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

But (ain't there always at least one) how do you know which will be read first? Catch-22. After thinking on it a bit, I don't know if this is really worth pursuing much (of course, that's up to

Seems cleaner and easier for the poster of the message to just send a PM to the group owner address asking them to delete the pending message. My two cents. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of