|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
FWIW we are now receiving some "subscription approval needed" emails multiple times.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for
FWIW we are now receiving some "subscription approval needed" emails multiple times.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24583
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
I'm still getting emails from online posts that I can see were done hours ago so it's obviously still catching up. Patience is a virtue :-)
Hopefully Mark will confirm when he thinks all is fully OK
I'm still getting emails from online posts that I can see were done hours ago so it's obviously still catching up. Patience is a virtue :-)
Hopefully Mark will confirm when he thinks all is fully OK
|
By
Andy Wedge
·
#24582
·
|
|
moderated
Re: (date) "invited" column incorrectly sorted in Sent invites
#bug
Mark, this is the bug report I was saying you could ignore and delete. I think the whole thing was caused by the system glitch you just reported.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
Mark, this is the bug report I was saying you could ignore and delete. I think the whole thing was caused by the system glitch you just reported.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24581
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
Ok, I didn't realize it was still working on catching up. Our pending subscription notices and confirmation notices are not going out at all.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
Ok, I didn't realize it was still working on catching up. Our pending subscription notices and confirmation notices are not going out at all.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24580
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
I had this for a new member I had added. It got updated as messages were delivered. They came out of the normal sequence but they all got there in the end. I'm sure it'll all be OK once the back end
I had this for a new member I had added. It got updated as messages were delivered. They came out of the normal sequence but they all got there in the end. I'm sure it'll all be OK once the back end
|
By
Andy Wedge
·
#24579
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
Mark,I think there might still be a delay. I resent several confirmation emails a few minutes ago and the people are showing no email deliveries in their history.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion
Mark,I think there might still be a delay. I resent several confirmation emails a few minutes ago and the people are showing no email deliveries in their history.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24578
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
p.s. Mark: Actually I think the display order problem was probably also caused by the same glitch, so you can ignore/delete my bug report about it. Thanks.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the
p.s. Mark: Actually I think the display order problem was probably also caused by the same glitch, so you can ignore/delete my bug report about it. Thanks.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24577
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Delayed email delivery
#outage
This appears to have affected things besides sent messages. Our six invites last night were marked as "sending" instead of "sent" until this morning, causing me to think something else was the cause.
This appears to have affected things besides sent messages. Our six invites last night were marked as "sending" instead of "sent" until this morning, causing me to think something else was the cause.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24576
·
|
|
moderated
Delayed email delivery
#outage
All,
Last night at 9:31pm Pacific Time, the database that stores email messages in the process of being delivered corrupted itself. I don't know how. Because of that, we stopped processing/delivering
All,
Last night at 9:31pm Pacific Time, the database that stores email messages in the process of being delivered corrupted itself. I don't know how. Because of that, we stopped processing/delivering
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24575
·
|
|
moderated
(date) "invited" column incorrectly sorted in Sent invites
#bug
We ran into a problem last night trying to resend some invites, where we were sending a new invite to several people who had been sent invites in the past. We sent new invites to avoid the (previously
We ran into a problem last night trying to resend some invites, where we were sending a new invite to several people who had been sent invites in the past. We sent new invites to avoid the (previously
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24574
·
|
|
moderated
Generate cal-summary emails based upon local timezone
#suggestion
Hi,
our #cal-summary emails have been generated at 07:00 (UTC) each Friday morning until the last couple of weeks when they have been created at 06:00. I suspect this is because of a clock change in
Hi,
our #cal-summary emails have been generated at 07:00 (UTC) each Friday morning until the last couple of weeks when they have been created at 06:00. I suspect this is because of a clock change in
|
By
Andy Wedge
·
#24573
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Solving the overload issue (Selecting specific messages into two batches - Individual email vs. Full featured digest delivery)
#suggestion
1. Also those who explicitely wanted to be only on digest will receive extra messages ( special notices) and hence feel „ flooded“
2. The term „special notice“ implies certain messages are
1. Also those who explicitely wanted to be only on digest will receive extra messages ( special notices) and hence feel „ flooded“
2. The term „special notice“ implies certain messages are
|
By
Homayon Reinhardt Chaudhry
·
#24572
·
|
|
moderated
Subject of Invitation Email Should Show "Group Title" (instead of Group Email Address)
#suggestion
My current Invitation emails shows
Invitation to join the KBlist@groups.io group
It can look a lot like spam, esp when I have my co-moderator do the inviting (since the recipient may not know
My current Invitation emails shows
Invitation to join the KBlist@groups.io group
It can look a lot like spam, esp when I have my co-moderator do the inviting (since the recipient may not know
|
By
Kumāra Bhikkhu
·
#24571
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Please allow non-premium groups to "confirm" new members
#suggestion
Well we shouldn't be. For the record, I asked for that feature years ago for premium groups, based on the fact that essentially, premium groups already confirm their own members since they can
Well we shouldn't be. For the record, I asked for that feature years ago for premium groups, based on the fact that essentially, premium groups already confirm their own members since they can
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24570
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Please allow non-premium groups to "confirm" new members
#suggestion
Yes, we are. "Edit email addresses & confirm members" is clearly labeled as a feature of a Premium/Enterprise group on the pricing page.
Duane
Yes, we are. "Edit email addresses & confirm members" is clearly labeled as a feature of a Premium/Enterprise group on the pricing page.
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#24569
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Please allow non-premium groups to "confirm" new members
#suggestion
We're not really talking about a premium feature. We're talking about removing a PITA. That should be standard, not extra.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy
We're not really talking about a premium feature. We're talking about removing a PITA. That should be standard, not extra.--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24568
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Please allow non-premium groups to "confirm" new members
#suggestion
The other solution is to make a system change. I see no reason not to. It is not in my budget to support two premium groups, and the second one has less than 100 members. --
J
Messages are the sole
The other solution is to make a system change. I see no reason not to. It is not in my budget to support two premium groups, and the second one has less than 100 members. --
J
Messages are the sole
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24567
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Please allow non-premium groups to "confirm" new members
#suggestion
It just dawned on me that there's a super simple answer to this, and J mentioned it in the first message - Upgrade your group to Premium. Confirming members is one of the things you get when you pay
It just dawned on me that there's a super simple answer to this, and J mentioned it in the first message - Upgrade your group to Premium. Confirming members is one of the things you get when you pay
|
By
Duane
·
#24566
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Mark in the time of COVID-19
#misc
Mark, if we cannot all understand and accept that life is upended for everyone no and for the foreseeable future, we're in trouble. I do believe that at the end of this, there will be some good that
Mark, if we cannot all understand and accept that life is upended for everyone no and for the foreseeable future, we're in trouble. I do believe that at the end of this, there will be some good that
|
By
Ginny T.
·
#24565
·
|
|
moderated
Re: #suggestion Allow owners more control over the Direct-Add initial email
#suggestion
Jim -- I'm not aware of a system message that contains anything of this nature. Are you sure it's not a problem with one of your own Member Notices? Could you please send us a copy of what you're
Jim -- I'm not aware of a system message that contains anything of this nature. Are you sure it's not a problem with one of your own Member Notices? Could you please send us a copy of what you're
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#24564
·
|