When we moved over from YG, we welcomed the possibility of turning our old compulsory but often misused message tags in compulsory hashtags and let the system take on some moderation duties. One of

That's not my intent. All things that can be used, can be misused, including existing groups.io features. Limiting features to things that cannot possibly be misused is too high a bar for

Glenn I don't concur with the analogy. You seem to be viewing your suggestion with focus on your needs only. It makes it seem that your pencil analogy disregards the value of any other groups'

I use and like hashtags on my group's messages. I don't need hashtags on group notifications, but I can live with them if necessary (I'll just ignore them). What would be infinitely more useful for

It could be restricted to x number of characters from the file name rather than the entire file name. Patti

No, very strongly no. That change would mean that a mail client that auto-added address book entries would end up with an entry saying: "Malcolm Austen via groups.io" <my personal@address> in their

My groups don't have this problem. In fact, we have a fairly rigid naming pattern. I would not want to see this discarded because there is some possible abuse somewhere. It's like not making

For the vast majority of users 'headers' and 'DMARC requirements' are meaningless terms, just part of the 'magic' that gets their messages through the system, without them having to care what's going

After doing a bit more thorough testing, I've discovered that TB does work properly if using the Reply button. It's the Reply All that will also populate the group name in addition to the sender. TB

Mark, I'd like to maintain a clear semantic and operational distinction between messages, which post to the group's archive and are sent to members in accordance to the Email

Filtering works on content as well as 'Subject'. Given that a lot of people can't restrain themselves with brevity in naming files, it may work out worse than a desirable feature. Regards davew

Mark, What Duane said. I think for Jim's use case it would suffice to remove List-Post when Remove other options is checked. Logically it makes no sense to provide the List-Post field when that is

Not really sure how to interpret radio silence here. Mark, your thoughts would be appreciated, if only so I can provide feedback back to my members saying it was considered. Many thanks

That shouldn't matter. Uncheck "Normalize HTML Emails," if you have it checked. Bruce

As far as I know, only Thunderbird (TB) is a problem, but they released a patch a few years ago to restore the previous (honor Reply-To) action. The problem is, their original change defaulted to

It looks like it worked in this group, but not in my other groups. The problem must be a setting I have in my other groups any idea what I should be looking for? Under the Message Formatting setting,

At a glance, it appears that most of this is geared toward notifications which could be enabled or disabled by each person for the web/app. I think appending a hashtag would be cleaner than inserting

And to add to that (as I've mentioned in the past): If and when possible, tailor each moderator's view of the activity log to match their permissions. (You could further restrict the view to their

I personally love the hashtag idea for this (but am not saying that you should not provide the ability for turning them off for people who don't want them). However, I want to push here again to make

Like many, I wasn't enamored with hashtags when I started out using groups.io. They seemed pretty superfluous. But as I looked into them further, I came to realize that they are a very powerful