Perhaps... I sincerely hope not. They ought to be able to suppress the worst effects by using the Mute this Hashtag function in the footer of a relevant email. A point that is, I think, common to

Is what you are doing changing the concept of how notifications will function? Up until now the owners/mods determine if something reaches the attention of the members. Will the eventual change mean

Definitely worth considering. I am also concious that the more "individual" notifications that there are the more important it becomes that individual members can have a pick list of those that they

Chris, I wrote: And given that such an aggregation wouldn't be tied to any single hashtag, perhaps it should be Moderated. This gives the moderator the option to approve or not, which satisfies the

Chris, That's an interesting point. For that use case the aggregation (or exclusion) would be better focused on the user than the activity. I'm not sure how difficult it would be to detect that

Sorry. Not any of the new notifications. We already have a system that combines notifications; it's currently only used for Github and Trello integration messages. Github especially can generate a

Perhaps so; the difficulty is identifying the "aggregation time". A further possible complication is that any given "tidying up" session might involve renaming an Album or Photo(s) or deleting an

Mark, Unfortunately, the boolean search #bug AND NOT #fixed doesn't seem to work. That would have been slick. I'm not sure if that's a bug, or if I'm misunderstanding how the booleans work. I hadn't

You can look at the #bug tag on beta, specifically the topics with #bug but without #fixed. In terms of the reminders, it is, unfortunately, difficult to fix, requiring re-writing a chunk of the

Ok, then. Could have mentioned that already. 😐 Thanks for the update, though. I'll have to check that out. -- Jim

Is there a list kept somewhere where the current bugs and suggestions are prioritized so we can see where our issues stand on a priority list? Is anyone else seeing the missing reminders bug besides

Mark, "Currently"? Does this imply implementation is rolled out? I concur with J, "Yes". I think otherwise they're out of sight out of mind. Moderators should be a bit more resilient and ready to

I "vote" yes on this. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

For the aggregated notifications, if you're worried about timeliness, there's always web/app notifications, which won't be aggregated and are delivered instantly. Also, currently the wait time to see

I use Firefox Multi-Account Containers which keeps cookies and session details isolated between tabs. No need for multiple browsers and different windows. I use a different coloured tab for each

Sorry, Duane, that's not true. I just tested it with FF and the exact same thing happens with multiple tabs in a private window as well as multiple private windows. That means session information is

Beth, If it helps, I've been trying to keep track of the current implementation in a page on GMF's Wiki: https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/21482 Shal

The latest versions of browsers, at least Firefox, allow you to open multiple private tabs that are totally isolated, so your logic would no longer apply. I've only used them for testing as it can

That is not the way to test among several accounts. It is very unreliable and/or unpredictable because the login is cached for the entire browser, not individual tabs. The proof is that, after fully

As a group of longarm quilters, we rely a lot on the photos feature. My members would like to have the ability to comment directly in the photo album of a particular quilt and they would also like a