Sorry, I'm done here. I've always loathed public groups. I would have joined groups.io much earlier, but it only allowed public groups at the time so we went with bigtent instead. I've also never

Oh, also your suggestion about new member notifications was golden. 😊 -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can

It's a given that it has not changed from private to public. That's a one-way street and goes only in the other direction. I concur with Mark about your excellent suggestions, in particular the one

Screen reader user here. Running Windows 10, 1909. In clients like Mozilla Thunderbird, headings are not rendering when I type in markdown in the web composer. For example,This heading, does not

I'm also happy this group has public archives, as I can give it a quick check for new messages at times when I don't want to log on. If it helps, the public can't see much about you from the archives

Hi Helen, It's always had a public archive, and that won't change. I have very much appreciated your feedback and suggestions over the years and hope you'll stay. Mark

Nope, it's been that way since day 1. It's so folks can find answers to questions without needing to join a group, same as Group_Help and GMF. Duane

Only just noticed this group has public archives. Not sure if this changed, because I never knowingly post in groups with public archives. In fact, I don't usually even join them. I see no reason why

I don't believe there's anything that causes that button to be available, it's just there. On my Thunderbird, it's always there, even if there's only one address to reply to. Duane

Thanks Mark. It appears that something else is still defeating Remove other Options, as the MUAs still present ReplyAll buttons which include the list-post address. The To: header points to the

+1. Of course 'most' ordinary users don't understand the technical aspect of the way the web (WWW) works anyway, so how things are 'magically' and invisibly downloaded compared to the act of

Yeah, right, REALLY fixed this time! 😊 Ok, thanks! -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Seems to be working, at least for the moment, with FF. Thanks, Duane

Hi, It should really be fixed now. Sorry for the bother. Thanks, Mark

That's a common misconception. In order to be viewed on your screen, the file is downloaded, at least part of it. All modern browsers that I'm aware of have a way to view PDF files. It's much more

This reply is also in Firefox, as was my last one. It only happens sporadically. Plus, Mark may already have rolled things back at this point. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

I wasn't aware of an issue and this reply has been in Firefox without a problem. Andy

Ok, well, that's frustrating. I'm rolling this back until I can figure something else out. Thanks, Mark

However, I'm almost certain I replied via web in the last reply I posted today, in the other thread about owner messages requiring subjects. And then when I tried to reply to this one via web, I

Not fixed for me. Same problem just now trying to reply to this.-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be