Hey, J, I've made it pretty clear more than once. I feel that Database operability is more important that all the effort on Notifications. -- Bob Bellizzi

YES! As I also requested in my message 20604. along with a couple of other handy dandy changes to Databases, viz I would like to get some feedback on my other suggestions for Database changes that

Agree with Chris. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Not quite. My point is that a moderator should have the option of not even originating a notification, whatever the member might select. cf now; if I upload a photo I can choose to send a notification

Chris, if I understand correctly, you are suggesting that a Moderator can control whether a member can opt to receive notifications for things like photo edit/move/delete actions? That would work for

Totally agree with the shudder factor. I would object strongly to members being notified of any deletion of their content. That's up to moderators. Notifying them of edits to their messages is one

<slight shudder> Only if that notification is optional on my part as a moderator. Two reasons; I don't want anything I do to tidy up (say) Photos to generate a blizzard of notifications (even to

Good idea. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Mark, Definitely yes. I'd generally say no, except add/modify photo album. And as mentioned before, for those that don't post I'd like the member whose content is affected (including deletes) to

My real-world scenario involves me being logged in with 3 different accounts at the same time on 3 different browser tabs, I don't need to logout to switch accounts, I just switch tabs. Andy

Yes! Second that! I've requested it in the past but don't think I made the request very clear.-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in

I'm assuming just the individual member and that it would be an option that could be switched off. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound

I certainly don't object, but would that be "all" likes or just those applicable to the individual member whose post has been "liked"? Either way IMHO it would have to be a notification that the

I like notifications for Likes. I see no reason to allow members to notify the group for content deletions, but I do think those should go to moderators. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

Is it possible to ‘freeze’ the top row of a database a la Excel etc? It is particularly irksome when editing or viewing an entry and then wondering what the column is? If you get my drift. Stay

I agree this is a bug since the system should have noticed the link for "Your Subscription" (which contains the id number of the intended subscriber constructed as https://groups.io/g/[group

We do need to keep a clear view regarding which of the existing system hashtags are intrinsic to the effective operation of groups.io. We've already mentioned #cal-reminder and #cal-notice in that

I'm getting rather loud alarm bells now with the list of Notifications growing. I'm still mulling over the question of Notifications to Moderators but I can see that notifications to members could

Right now the following notifications are missing: delete file/photo/wiki page, close chat, add/modify/delete photo album. 1) Should I add those as notifications that group members can send when

Hi Mark, this may be an anomaly due to the way I'm testing but I thought I'd mention it anyway. From my 'owner' account using the web UI I send a message to my testing subgroup. When I open the email