However, I'm almost certain I replied via web in the last reply I posted today, in the other thread about owner messages requiring subjects. And then when I tried to reply to this one via web, I

Not fixed for me. Same problem just now trying to reply to this.-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be

Hi All, I think I've fixed the problem with the text editor not coming up when replying to a message on Firefox. Can you please test it and let me know if it's fixed for you? Thanks, Mark

As they are. The suggestion in this thread has nothing to do with group messages. It is about messages going only to the owner/moderators of a group. Group members don't even receive such messages, so

One of my groups is starting to use the Files section for a 'library' of catalogs. Most are uploaded as either PDF files and occasionally Word Doc files. It would be very useful to be able to preview

Of course Subjects should be required. Especially in a group or forum ... otherwise how does one know if they are opening a Topcical or OFF TOPIC item? There are enough other time-sucks in the world.

My Suggestion is to separate the "View/Online" link into "View Thread" and "Reply online". I always have to generate an empty message whenever I wawnn to review the thread. Regards Georg Klein

Been writing some babysitting queries that interact with the API to get members and database rows. While the API docs clearly say HTTP Basic Auth when using the token style of authentication, it never

And since posting this I found that it's the same after using the New Topic links in a Full Digest. Andy

Hi, I think it would be helpful to have the Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links shown at the bottom of the Daily Summary email also shown at the bottom of a Full Digest to provide a

Hi Mark, a Daily Summary contains Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links at the bottom. After using the New Topic link a new topic window is shown but the Send and Discard buttons don't work

Yes! Was definitely riffing on him. You got it! 😻-- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together.

Are you riffing T.S. Eliot's The Naming of Cats? If so, I approve. Best, Glenn -- PG&E Delenda Est Virus-free. www.avast.com

Divining intent is a perilous matter When multiple plausible meanings exist. Some people may just mean to clean up their chatter But just by pure chance they make others quite pissed. --

I think divining intent from semantics is a perilous business, in particular when there are multiple plausible intents. Some people may intend to start a new thread by changing the

Folks, If you change the subject line you probably intend to start a new thread. The problem is when you mail client changes the subject. In the past, but perhaps not on ”groups.io” I have

Malcolm Austen: Indeed. I thought the question was asked as to how messages can be threaded correctly if they have no subject line. I attempted to answer that in such a case they can be threaded

This has been hashed and rehashed an rerehashed in the past and the decision was made to thread topics based on subject line as well, because sometimes they were not threading correctly otherwise. I

Malcolm Austen: I argue the converse. If you want to start a new topic, you should compose a new message. It should be permissible to correct a typo in the subject line without starting a new

I disagree. If you change the subjectline, it's your intention to create a new thread. Also, I don't want to copy one of the worst parts of googlegroups: if you send a reply to a digest about subject