I have done sufficient testing with PDF files and .txt files to be certain that text indexing that happened to old files is no longer happening with new files. Discussed in GMF at

Mark I have a number of emails going back to last Wednesday that still have not emailed out to members. I have provided support with the message ID numbers. Should we do a new support ticket? Thank

Thanks Mark. I know the ICS stuff has been a game a Whack-A-Mole for you. -- Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager for ONAP The Linux Foundation Pacific Time Zone

Thanks Bruce. good call, but I've already tried that. The requirements list is coincidently one that was renamed, but the generation of new subscriptions has not resolved the problem. Also there

Hi Kenny, I am sorry about the bugs you're experiencing. The ICS file spec is not my favorite. I have fixed the escaping issue that was causing GCal to not parse that file. It now parses it correctly.

Hi Mark, If one group's settings is FollowingOnly and they click on the Follow This Topic link at the footer of an emailed message from the group, as expected they are taken to the

If you change the name of a group/subgroup that also affects the feed address. You will have to click the Subscribe to Calendar button again to get a new GIO feed and re-sub that to the Google

Peter -- Well, now I'm just being dumb. Apparently, my Owner account was actually moderated in my test group. I must have left it that way from some previous test I was doing. So it actually did go

I've about reached my breaking point related to Gio cal vs. G-cal and the unhealthy frienemy relationship they have had over the past couple of years. You can subscribe to the a couple of our Gio

Hi Mark, I searched and found that you mentioned in the July 24 site updates change log that "BUGFIX: Fixed sorting of Files section search results."

Hi All, We are caught up with email delivery. Thanks,Mark

Hi All, As you've hopefully noticed, email has started to flow again. We have quite a backlog to work through, however, so it will take some time before we're caught up. I believe I've stabilized

Thanks, Bruce. Yes, I'm aware of this. In fact I posted some time ago, either in GMF or here, about the inconsistent use of the word "bounce." Pete

Folks, I apologize - I misinterpreted what happened. The moderator in question actually added the new hashtag via the group website before posting the message. However, there is still a mystery: As I

Hello, We're currently seeing delayed delivery of email. I'm investigating and will post more when I know. Thanks, Mark

Further nailing down the bug: It turns out that the notifications are being sent for moderation in my group not because #file-notice is set to Moderated (it's not), but because my group is set to MFF

Peter -- The wording for this setting is currently being discussed for revision. Under no circumstances are messages actually bounced based on this setting. The help docs are also unclear on

So the message was (correctly) sent for moderation but the hashtag was created anyway, before the message was approved? That does sound like the wrong order. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

That seems to be correct. But the bug is that even though my group is not moderated, and even though the hashtags are (correctly) not set to moderated, the notifications are being sent to pending for

It is now "later". :) I have spent a little time refreshing my memory about all this. My principal recollection is that I ended up thoroughly befuddled about the way things worked, or at least seemed