And one more thing - although I understand the current challenge and complication with email replies, this bug exists even when you reply on the web, which is much easier to make work properly and

How about having a thread GUID in each sent out message that will be used to put the message under the proper thread? A feature allowing merging of threads would be lovely, too, as one of my thread

Thanks, Mark.

I am not aware of any IE11 issues. But I also don't use it. Anyone here use IE11? We don't have any of that, so it appears that he's looking at a non-Groups.io page. Maybe a profile page for his

You might have him delete his temporary files and see if that helps. Judy F. SW Florida - USA

Hi We have a member who is having problems using Groups.io with IE11. He was moved from YahooGroups with everyone else to 1A-Travelzine. He couldn’t login. Tried many times. Finally he has been

I think I’m in agreement with this solution also. I definitely don’t like the one where a message is sent out. That will really confuse people, especially those that don’t know what they are

Ahh, alt codes. I used to use those to do line graphics on the screens of my BBS in the mid-1980s.. Had them all memorized and everything. Ahem. Not a dumb question. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar

Without fully understanding all the complexities, my vote would be for whatever works to force the new subject into a new thread and any responses that come back with the original subject stay grouped

Yes, this is a known issue, and a bit of a tricky one at that. Here's what's happening: - A thread is started, some emails get sent out with Subject Line A - The thread's subject line is changed to

I have what may be a dumb question - but that never stopped me before! I've used the Windows Alt Key Numeric Codes (ALT + XXXX on the numeric keypad) for many years, but they don't seem to work

Details, details... (grin) Duane

Bah! Oops! Bang! Frotz! Funny what a strategically placed extra space character can do in certain circumstances. Sorry about that, it's been fixed. Mark

If you rename a thread, the old name still stays in the activity log, which is not a huge issue. The real issue is that when people reply to messages, the old thread name is used and thus a new thread

Hi Mark, The reply to sender, reply to group is acting up. Same problem when replying to sender with thread view or message view. The email body looks like this: --3-6145586333-1074296831=:5

Changes to the site today: Announced easy group transfer on updates@ When replying to a post on the website, there are now options to Reply to Sender or Reply to Group. Fixed bug with owner only

Judy wrote:>>I was making a point that if the moderator doesn't have the access they need, then why have a moderator. << Sorry if I misunderstood. I thought it was a question. And I was trying to

Brenda, I fully agree with you that naming a successor is the way forward, as long as it is well publicised and positively encouraged, but perhaps not compulsory ( I'm throwing a bone there

Brenda, I'm aware of what a moderator should do, I am a moderators on several groups and owner on several others. I wasn't asking the question as a question, I was making a point that if the

Robert wrote:>>This is a scenario, which needs to have a better solution here, I feel.<< I agree. Hence the idea of the owner being allowed to name a successor, to be given ownership of the group if