Hi #33 reminds me of another logo. Can’t remember what. Thought it might be General Electric but that’s not it. Interesting. It is instructive to do a Google image search for G logo. Might help

Update on my preferences 10 clean, simple 13 if you drop the tail off the G. Clean, simple, suggests email 20 another that's clean, simple & suggests email 22 for the color only...if you drop that

Here's my thoughts: The ones that emphasise the G can suggest Google, so not such a good idea (which is a pity, but there we are) - but see also below. The ones that use a graphic for the ".io" part

Yeah, that just gave me a chuckle...

I like 6 and 26 myself.

That's tough because groups can be so very different and all may be good for those that use them. I think the top criteria is activity. Do people post freely and often? IS there some good discussion?

Gee, why does that not surprise me? VBG Duane

sorry sent my ? before I saw your answer. Thanks, Mark.

It may depend on the individual group, as different groups might have different needs. I will think on it. You did not ask for charestics of an owner. Does that follow under moderator?

Changes to the site the last couple days: When a reply to a message comes in from a thread whose subject has been edited, we send out the message with the new subject. Improved the error message

Steph, Thanks for your response. Just one clarification for everyone: When I said moderator, I mean both moderators and owners (i.e. person or persons that runs a group). Thanks! Mark

Hello Mark, Below are my responses. First question you asked: What characteristics do you think make a successful group? I think it's members and their activity. I have a group out here that is for

Hi All, I'd like to try something a little different and I hope you'll indulge me. I have a couple of questions for you. 1) What characteristics do you think make a successful group? 2) What

Donna, Soylent logo is people!!! (Sorry, couldn't resist). I detest the little tails on many of these, representing speech balloons. That to me is clear iconography for chat or text message, not

#13 by bentrisku It's simple, CLEAN, leads people here and more importantly doesn't have the trailing smaller and smaller emails drifting off which

I would vote for #16. At first, it looks like a very simple design. Upon closer examination, one can see that it is a group of 4 people. I'm not sure how to interpret the tail on the one; but,

Finally getting back to this. I just pushed the following to production: If a thread's subject has changed, and we get a reply to an already sent out message in the thread (with the old subject), we

I also like 19 and 20, but I wonder why 19 used green when the desired colors are listed as blue, white & orange? I guess that's easy enough to change if that logo wins. 10 is still nice and clean

Hi Here’s what I DON’T like and why. #9 looks like a table rather than an envelope and seems to imply business. #11 looks like Angry Birds. #3 and #5 - been done. #12 - I like it but perhaps G

I like #12 ´ Vickie