|
locked
Updates to Trello
[Beta] New card "Ability to re-orient photo attachments in pending messages and when editing existing messages." was added to list "Messages and Archives".
[Beta] The blue label "Messages &
[Beta] New card "Ability to re-orient photo attachments in pending messages and when editing existing messages." was added to list "Messages and Archives".
[Beta] The blue label "Messages &
|
By
Beta Integration <beta+integration@...>
·
#3352
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
My opinion is that it doesn't really matter. Personally, if I want to reply to a topic off list to a specific member, from my email account, I would prefer to have the email address visible. Or, to
My opinion is that it doesn't really matter. Personally, if I want to reply to a topic off list to a specific member, from my email account, I would prefer to have the email address visible. Or, to
|
By
Donna
·
#3351
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
>>The owner’s ability to set his preference has not (and should not) change. <<
I agree...
´
Vickie
>>The owner’s ability to set his preference has not (and should not) change. <<
I agree...
´
Vickie
|
By
vickie <vickie_00@...>
·
#3350
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi,
Yahoo has the address after your address, but yes, it is the same. I like both, really.
Hi,
Yahoo has the address after your address, but yes, it is the same. I like both, really.
|
By
Rajmund <brajmund2000@...>
·
#3349
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi All,
Thanks for the feedback. What I've done for now is that if a group's member list is *not* visible to subscribers, then we'll obscure email addresses in the archives. If the member list is
Hi All,
Thanks for the feedback. What I've done for now is that if a group's member list is *not* visible to subscribers, then we'll obscure email addresses in the archives. If the member list is
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#3348
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
I think this is probably a good option. That's what Yahoo does now.
Dano
I think this is probably a good option. That's what Yahoo does now.
Dano
|
By
D R Stinson
·
#3347
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi,
I personally liked the archives saying from: brajmund2000@.....
Yet, you can see the gmail part yourself in the from. I personally think that that is how it should stay. But, I don't own a
Hi,
I personally liked the archives saying from: brajmund2000@.....
Yet, you can see the gmail part yourself in the from. I personally think that that is how it should stay. But, I don't own a
|
By
Rajmund <brajmund2000@...>
·
#3346
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Coming in late - is that something that could be
decided per group?
Some groups prefer - or require - that responses go to
the sender, not the group (freecycle, for example),
some don't care (my
Coming in late - is that something that could be
decided per group?
Some groups prefer - or require - that responses go to
the sender, not the group (freecycle, for example),
some don't care (my
|
By
Diana Gregory
·
#3345
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi Vickie,
Your suggestion to replace email addresses with ID names is a good one. In cases where the subscriber has not provided his ID Name, I suggest that the system include the subscriber’s
Hi Vickie,
Your suggestion to replace email addresses with ID names is a good one. In cases where the subscriber has not provided his ID Name, I suggest that the system include the subscriber’s
|
By
Linda
·
#3344
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
hmm. Perhaps the best solution is to obscure the emails in the to field and replace it with ID names if this is possible
but not from moderators
Obscure from members emails in the to field, replace
hmm. Perhaps the best solution is to obscure the emails in the to field and replace it with ID names if this is possible
but not from moderators
Obscure from members emails in the to field, replace
|
By
vickie <vickie_00@...>
·
#3343
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi,
OK, I think I'm getting it. Here's a member's point of view.
If the archive is private, let us see the address. If public, obviously, no. And here's why I think we should see it. We see the from
Hi,
OK, I think I'm getting it. Here's a member's point of view.
If the archive is private, let us see the address. If public, obviously, no. And here's why I think we should see it. We see the from
|
By
Rajmund <brajmund2000@...>
·
#3342
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi,
What got changed, exactly? I can't see a difference, as a member. Can someone clarify, please?
Hi,
What got changed, exactly? I can't see a difference, as a member. Can someone clarify, please?
|
By
Rajmund <brajmund2000@...>
·
#3341
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
I can see where there would be many different opinions, since there are so
many different groups with different objectives and different memberships
and audiences. Here's my nickel's worth.
I think
I can see where there would be many different opinions, since there are so
many different groups with different objectives and different memberships
and audiences. Here's my nickel's worth.
I think
|
By
D R Stinson
·
#3340
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Obscure, but not to moderators.
´
Vickie
Obscure, but not to moderators.
´
Vickie
|
By
vickie <vickie_00@...>
·
#3339
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi Marlin,
My thought is that single messages and digests could contain links to the web site to make it possible for replies to be sent to the posting member via the system – without exposing the
Hi Marlin,
My thought is that single messages and digests could contain links to the web site to make it possible for replies to be sent to the posting member via the system – without exposing the
|
By
Linda
·
#3338
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Well, I thought about asking you that, privately, off of the group, but decided to send my message to the group instead.
If your address was obscured, that choice would be taken away
Well, I thought about asking you that, privately, off of the group, but decided to send my message to the group instead.
If your address was obscured, that choice would be taken away
|
By
Marlin47
·
#3337
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Yes, Marlin, I would want it obscured everywhere, if possible.
Thanks for asking,
Linda
Yes, Marlin, I would want it obscured everywhere, if possible.
Thanks for asking,
Linda
|
By
Linda
·
#3336
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Hi, here is my vote.
I think it should hidden to members but not to group owners and moderators.
Hi, here is my vote.
I think it should hidden to members but not to group owners and moderators.
|
By
Steph <hsrsp@...>
·
#3335
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Mark, whatever you decide, I think I would ask that the addresses not be available for non-members.
Some groups may opt to have the archives open to non-members. It does not
Mark, whatever you decide, I think I would ask that the addresses not be available for non-members.
Some groups may opt to have the archives open to non-members. It does not
|
By
Marlin47
·
#3334
·
|
|
locked
Re: Email address obscuring
Linda, I can see your address at the top of the message you just sent.
Would you want it to be obscured there as well?
Just asking/
Marlin
Linda, I can see your address at the top of the message you just sent.
Would you want it to be obscured there as well?
Just asking/
Marlin
|
By
Marlin47
·
#3333
·
|