[Beta] New card "Ability to re-orient photo attachments in pending messages and when editing existing messages." was added to list "Messages and Archives". [Beta] The blue label "Messages &

My opinion is that it doesn't really matter. Personally, if I want to reply to a topic off list to a specific member, from my email account, I would prefer to have the email address visible. Or, to

>>The owner’s ability to set his preference has not (and should not) change. << I agree... ´ Vickie

Hi, Yahoo has the address after your address, but yes, it is the same. I like both, really.

Hi All, Thanks for the feedback. What I've done for now is that if a group's member list is *not* visible to subscribers, then we'll obscure email addresses in the archives. If the member list is

I think this is probably a good option. That's what Yahoo does now. Dano

Hi, I personally liked the archives saying from: brajmund2000@..... Yet, you can see the gmail part yourself in the from. I personally think that that is how it should stay. But, I don't own a

Coming in late - is that something that could be decided per group? Some groups prefer - or require - that responses go to the sender, not the group (freecycle, for example), some don't care (my

Hi Vickie, Your suggestion to replace email addresses with ID names is a good one. In cases where the subscriber has not provided his ID Name, I suggest that the system include the subscriber’s

hmm. Perhaps the best solution is to obscure the emails in the to field and replace it with ID names if this is possible but not from moderators Obscure from members emails in the to field, replace

Hi, OK, I think I'm getting it. Here's a member's point of view. If the archive is private, let us see the address. If public, obviously, no. And here's why I think we should see it. We see the from

Hi, What got changed, exactly? I can't see a difference, as a member. Can someone clarify, please?

I can see where there would be many different opinions, since there are so many different groups with different objectives and different memberships and audiences. Here's my nickel's worth. I think

Obscure, but not to moderators. ´ Vickie

Hi Marlin, My thought is that single messages and digests could contain links to the web site to make it possible for replies to be sent to the posting member via the system – without exposing the

Well, I thought about asking you that, privately, off of the group, but decided to send my message to the group instead. If your address was obscured, that choice would be taken away

Yes, Marlin, I would want it obscured everywhere, if possible. Thanks for asking, Linda

Hi, here is my vote. I think it should hidden to members but not to group owners and moderators.

Mark, whatever you decide, I think I would ask that the addresses not be available for non-members. Some groups may opt to have the archives open to non-members. It does not

Linda, I can see your address at the top of the message you just sent. Would you want it to be obscured there as well? Just asking/ Marlin