Hi Mark F, Cleaner, more concise, less creep into areas where it shouldn't be creeping and areas that should be the domain of the group owners, less of the "if you don't like what you get from the

Mark Bielecki wrote:>>Hi kr402, I believe you were looking for message #1555 on Feb. 4, 2015 from Mark F....,<< Thanks Mark B., now I don't have to hunt it up! Brenda

J_catlady wrote:>>What is adult content or an 'adult group'? Anything having to do with (excuse the term) sex?<< My opinion from the previous discussion some time back, is that it is groups that are

Mark B., Keep reading. I have again revised the COC and tried to take into consideration what you all are saying. Of course, Mark has the final say. Brenda

OWL: After reading over this some more, here are my suggested revisions: ********************************************************** We Want to Maintain A Civilized Place for Public Discussion We are

Hi Brenda, The problem is that conduct and content are oftentimes hand in hand with one another; the content of a post is interpreted by somebody as being disallowed conduct because of how it was

I just took a look at the Ning page at http://www.ning.com/adult-content-policy/ Two things strike me about it as being unreasonable. 1. It says in the list of things not allowed: "Nudity (exposed

Brenda, I totally agree with the overall feeling you express here, and I do feel really funny even responding negatively in any way to the proposed CoC, given how responsive and generally awesome

I am not in favor of a blanket/imposed Code of Conduct for Groups.io. It is obvious to me that the wording of any CoC would never be able to please everyone and would most likely cause more problems

Hi kr402, Your reference to fetishes and the bible highlights some interesting conundrums of sorts relating to both the proposed Groups.io CofC and the TOU. The proposed CofC states: We are

Okay, I have not read everything in here yet, but I feel I have to say something here. Mark's COC is not a guide to what people can and can't talk about (with certain restrictions like Adult content

Thanks, Brenda. Yes, I've now seen the comments about Joe (is that KR?) having "been told" that no adult content groups are allowed here. The issue (or one of them) for me would be, told by whom? It

Done. When a moderator edits another person's message and uses Save Without Sending, the original author will now be emailed a copy of the edited message. Also, a flash message is now displayed after

Mark Bielecki wrote:>>I don't think there's anything to apologize for;  the can of worms has been previously opened with the proposal of a groupwide, mandated CofC,<< Not so, Mark. That statement

KR wrote:>>Thanks, for your reply. I wish I could find the previous discussion about 'adult groups' and 'role play groups'. Also, where fetishes, etc was listed.<< KR, I'll see if I can track down

You are correct, KR. It was discussed in this group early on, and Joe was one of the people who was told that his adult groups were not allowed. I'm assuming Mark means X-rated, or porn. Brenda

Catlady, It was asked in this group about whether "adult content" groups were allowed in here by Joe, and he was told no. I took it to mean those groups that are there to share porn, sexual content,

[Beta] New comment on card "When replying to a message on the website, have the option to change the subject, which would start a new thread." by Mark Fletcher: Added and pushed to the

Hi J_catlady, Since Groups.io is being used across international borders the TOU and CofC standards would have to be EXACTINGLY spelled out, both relating to governmental standards as well as to

Yes, that is it. Thanks! 'adult content' is specifically mentioned there and is exactly what I was referring to when I posted, although I understand no one else would have known that. What does