Under Privacy on our new group, we have a choice of Listed in Directory, publicly viewable archives or private archives. Does publicly viewable archives mean that all the people on the group can

Mark, In Yahoo Groups the "Fully featured" digests each message has a mailto: link that allows one to reply to that message. The mailto: URL syntax allows them to provide To, Subject, and even body

Changes to the site today: - Several issues involving message processing for plain text only groups were fixed. - Email with multiple text parts in multipart/mixed or multipart/related chunks was not

I hadn't thought about the +owner parallel. That makes me like the group+subgroup@groups.io idea more. I agree with you about being about directly add people from the group into the subgroup; that

You cannot reply to digests on groups.io, the replies are blackholed (ideally they should bounce back; it's on the todo list). Mark

From all the data I've seen (mainly the email corpuses I assembled when I started working on groups.io back in January), In-Reply-To and/or References are more or less universally supported by email

markf@corp.groups.io sendis: that's how it should be That could be somewhat problematic when someone replies to part(s) of a digest, wouldn't it? groetjes, Ronaldo --

Mark, Hmm, using the absence of the In-Reply-To or References fields to mark a new thread has the problem that neither field is mandatory. I don't know if there are any major email services/clients

Mark, Well, the owners and moderators of a group are a natural example of asub-group; one partially supported via thegroupname+owner@groups.io address. The usual reason that Yahoo Groupmoderators

Hmm, it does appear there's a bug there. I'll fix it. Thanks, Mark

Frances, I agree that it is a little confusing right now. And you are correct, right now in the Group view, there is no way to mute a thread. I will add that to the TODO list. Right now the only

Frances, Here's how a thread happens. Someone sends a message. Others reply to that message, or to other replies. All of those are in one thread. If someone replies, but changes the subject, then that

Hmm. At first blush doesn't feel like it should be a #hashtag thing, but maybe a groupname+subgroup@groups.io thing. Hashtags are more for archive organization and muting. Anyone else have any

Hi again I was wondering how threads work. We have a travel discussion forum so some wording might appear on different posts and appear to be a thread. Like “Rome hotel”. It is particularly

Hi again It seems that the Archive search box for a specific group operates differently if you search by thread view or by message view. If I go to a specific group, and search for the word hashtags

Hi Mark, I have a question or two about the way Groups.io works. There seems to be two views for messages - an Inbox for all groups I belong to (Home), and a screen for each group I belong to. (from

- Hadn't thought about archives, but likely prefer to have them hidden from non-members. - Joining: ATM I'd be great with manually adding members, but did imagine an "application" or "subscribe"

Hmm, subgroup by hashtag. Interesting. Would you want the archives of this subgroup to be available to all the members of the group or just the people in the subgroup? Would you want anyone in the

Not sure this is the spot for feature suggestions, but I find myself needing... A way to message a sub-set of the group (leaders) privately from the larger general members. I realize I could set up a

I'm going to start posting what changes have been made to the site. I'll do so under the hashtag #updates, so if you're not interested in the minutia, you can mute it. Changes to the site today: The