|
locked
Re: suggestion: subgroups (was private hashtags)
#suggestion
I hadn't thought about the +owner parallel. That makes me like the group+subgroup@groups.io idea more. I agree with you about being about directly add people from the group into the subgroup; that
I hadn't thought about the +owner parallel. That makes me like the group+subgroup@groups.io idea more. I agree with you about being about directly add people from the group into the subgroup; that
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#95
·
|
|
locked
Re: Threads
You cannot reply to digests on groups.io, the replies are blackholed (ideally they should bounce back; it's on the todo list).
Mark
You cannot reply to digests on groups.io, the replies are blackholed (ideally they should bounce back; it's on the todo list).
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#94
·
|
|
locked
Re: Threads
From all the data I've seen (mainly the email corpuses I assembled when I started working on groups.io back in January), In-Reply-To and/or References are more or less universally supported by email
From all the data I've seen (mainly the email corpuses I assembled when I started working on groups.io back in January), In-Reply-To and/or References are more or less universally supported by email
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#93
·
|
|
locked
Re: Threads
markf@corp.groups.io sendis:
that's how it should be
That could be somewhat problematic when someone replies to part(s) of a digest, wouldn't it?
groetjes, Ronaldo
--
markf@corp.groups.io sendis:
that's how it should be
That could be somewhat problematic when someone replies to part(s) of a digest, wouldn't it?
groetjes, Ronaldo
--
|
By
ro-esp
·
#92
·
|
|
locked
Re: Threads
Mark,
Hmm, using the absence of the In-Reply-To or References fields to mark a new thread has the problem that neither field is mandatory. I don't know if there are any major email services/clients
Mark,
Hmm, using the absence of the In-Reply-To or References fields to mark a new thread has the problem that neither field is mandatory. I don't know if there are any major email services/clients
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#90
·
|
|
locked
Re: suggestion: subgroups (was private hashtags)
#suggestion
Mark,
Well, the owners and moderators of a group are a natural example of asub-group; one partially supported via thegroupname+owner@groups.io address. The usual reason that Yahoo Groupmoderators
Mark,
Well, the owners and moderators of a group are a natural example of asub-group; one partially supported via thegroupname+owner@groups.io address. The usual reason that Yahoo Groupmoderators
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#88
·
|
|
locked
Re: Searching archive
Hmm, it does appear there's a bug there. I'll fix it.
Thanks,
Mark
Hmm, it does appear there's a bug there. I'll fix it.
Thanks,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#87
·
|
|
locked
Re: Inbox, Archive and muting
Frances,
I agree that it is a little confusing right now. And you are correct, right now in the Group view, there is no way to mute a thread. I will add that to the TODO list.
Right now the only
Frances,
I agree that it is a little confusing right now. And you are correct, right now in the Group view, there is no way to mute a thread. I will add that to the TODO list.
Right now the only
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#86
·
|
|
locked
Re: Threads
Frances,
Here's how a thread happens. Someone sends a message. Others reply to that message, or to other replies. All of those are in one thread. If someone replies, but changes the subject, then that
Frances,
Here's how a thread happens. Someone sends a message. Others reply to that message, or to other replies. All of those are in one thread. If someone replies, but changes the subject, then that
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#85
·
|
|
locked
Re: suggestion: private hashtags
#suggestion
Hmm. At first blush doesn't feel like it should be a #hashtag thing, but maybe a groupname+subgroup@groups.io thing. Hashtags are more for archive organization and muting.
Anyone else have any
Hmm. At first blush doesn't feel like it should be a #hashtag thing, but maybe a groupname+subgroup@groups.io thing. Hashtags are more for archive organization and muting.
Anyone else have any
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#84
·
|
|
locked
Threads
Hi again
I was wondering how threads work.
We have a travel discussion forum so some wording might appear on different posts and appear to be a thread. Like “Rome hotel”.
It is particularly
Hi again
I was wondering how threads work.
We have a travel discussion forum so some wording might appear on different posts and appear to be a thread. Like “Rome hotel”.
It is particularly
|
By
Frances
·
#83
·
|
|
locked
Searching archive
Hi again
It seems that the Archive search box for a specific group operates differently if you search by thread view or by message view.
If I go to a specific group, and search for the word hashtags
Hi again
It seems that the Archive search box for a specific group operates differently if you search by thread view or by message view.
If I go to a specific group, and search for the word hashtags
|
By
Frances
·
#82
·
|
|
locked
Inbox, Archive and muting
Hi Mark,
I have a question or two about the way Groups.io works.
There seems to be two views for messages - an Inbox for all groups I belong to (Home), and a screen for each group I belong to. (from
Hi Mark,
I have a question or two about the way Groups.io works.
There seems to be two views for messages - an Inbox for all groups I belong to (Home), and a screen for each group I belong to. (from
|
By
Frances
·
#81
·
|
|
locked
Re: suggestion: private hashtags
#suggestion
- Hadn't thought about archives, but likely prefer to have them hidden from non-members.
- Joining: ATM I'd be great with manually adding members, but did imagine an "application" or "subscribe"
- Hadn't thought about archives, but likely prefer to have them hidden from non-members.
- Joining: ATM I'd be great with manually adding members, but did imagine an "application" or "subscribe"
|
By
Derek Shanahan <derek@...>
·
#80
·
|
|
locked
Re: suggestion: private hashtags
#suggestion
Hmm, subgroup by hashtag. Interesting. Would you want the archives of this subgroup to be available to all the members of the group or just the people in the subgroup? Would you want anyone in the
Hmm, subgroup by hashtag. Interesting. Would you want the archives of this subgroup to be available to all the members of the group or just the people in the subgroup? Would you want anyone in the
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#79
·
|
|
locked
suggestion: private hashtags
#suggestion
Not sure this is the spot for feature suggestions, but I find myself needing...
A way to message a sub-set of the group (leaders) privately from the larger general members. I realize I could set up a
Not sure this is the spot for feature suggestions, but I find myself needing...
A way to message a sub-set of the group (leaders) privately from the larger general members. I realize I could set up a
|
By
Derek Shanahan <derek@...>
·
#78
·
|
|
locked
Tuesday site changes
#changelog
I'm going to start posting what changes have been made to the site. I'll do so under the hashtag #updates, so if you're not interested in the minutia, you can mute it.
Changes to the site today:
The
I'm going to start posting what changes have been made to the site. I'll do so under the hashtag #updates, so if you're not interested in the minutia, you can mute it.
Changes to the site today:
The
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#77
·
|
|
locked
Re: trimming and e-mail
EXcellent, thank you!
--
rgds
LAurence
EXcellent, thank you!
--
rgds
LAurence
|
By
Laurence Taylor
·
#76
·
|
|
locked
Re: Help Center
This gets better and better.
Judy F.
SW Florida - USA
This gets better and better.
Judy F.
SW Florida - USA
|
By
Judy F.
·
#75
·
|
|
locked
Re: Help Center
That is certainly our goal.
Thanks,
Mark
That is certainly our goal.
Thanks,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#74
·
|