J- The long version: https://onelist.wingedpig.com/ Dano

Egroups is what Mark Fletcher sold to Yahoo. We went from ecircles to egroups when they merger to Yahoo. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory! Bob -- Bob

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:32 PM, J_Catlady wrote: This is going over my head. Please explain. ;) As I understand it, one of the early mail list services of this kind was ONElist, which was created by

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 08:28 PM, Andy wrote: Especially with EGROUPS (eGroups) in the subject lineThis is going over my head. Please explain. ;) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

Seriously, I thought this was a joke! Especially with EGROUPS (eGroups) in the subject line. That's cruel.

I’m a big fan of the mobile app. When viewing the Admin list of Members, I often need to send messages to the new members who conveniently appear at the top of the list. But, after selecting them, I

Please, someone, kill this thread? We are not going to rename groups.io. DaveD On 1/25/2022 8:02 PM, Steven M via groups.io wrote: This email has been checked

I also agree as well. I suggest that you send a link to them.

I agree, we need to leave it ast groups.io

Steven, I'm sorry but I cannot before this proposal, because it has been groups.io since the very beginning of the service and I've been a part of the service since the beginning. And I think that

Would that be like Facebook changing to "Meta"? ;) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

On 01/25/2022 17:02, Steven M via groups.io wrote: Respectfully, I've never had this problem. All of my group members of my various groups seem to remember the name easily enough

hi everyone. I have a suggestion; we need to pick a much better name for this site!!! I have been trying to repeatedly tell other about this site and its great features!!! there is just one

Henning- I agree with your point about simplicity--and am sorry for having added bells and whistles to my suggestion. A moderation option that would allow X posts within Y time period, and either

Sorry for thinking in spurts, but it could be like hashtags that moderate vs lock topics. The setting could have three parts: the threshold (number of messages), the time period, and the action (set

Speaking of making it similar to new-member moderation, one idea along those lines would be sort of the reverse of new-member moderation: moderate the person‘s messages after they post x messages

I agree. No one here is in a position to say whether something is or isn't "too much work" for someone else, or whether something is "likely the wrong job" for another moderator. Just stop. Pete

I don't think "moderator shaming" is helpful or versions of "I don't need it for my group, so nobody needs [feature X]". I see the role of platforms like groups.io to simplify the tedious aspects of

Most of my group's wiki pages need to be private, and we therefore set the wiki for member, not public, access only. But there are a few pages that I would like to open up to the public so that I can

Mark, I’m not talking about anything arbitrary. The admin of that group would pick which column to sort by. Perhaps a simple checkbox could be used to indicate the column by which you want the