Typo: I wrote "Furthermore, the combined list does not have at least names from one of the lists". It should read "Furthermore, the combined list does not have at least some of the names from one of

Well, that was what I first thought it might be. But that is not what actually happens. Checking "Banned" and "Bouncing" gives me a large number of names, larger than either "Banned" or "Bouncing"

It's doing what it's designed to do. The options on the filter list are grouped and separated by a horizontal lines. Options within the same group are logically 'OR'd so selecting Not Confirmed and

I think this is a bug, but it's minor and probably of little consequence, so I'm labeling it "#misc" rather than "#bug". If a moderator goes to Admin - Members, then clicks Filter, and checks off more

p.s. The workaround that I'm sure someone is about to suggest is to delete the attachments and then send them correctly named in a reply message. And that's what I've resorted to doing in some cases.

Now that my group is set to moderate messages with attachments, I can succesfully reject messages with attachments that don't conform to our naming convention. However, that just necessitates my

Looking good, it's working again. Thanks!

Hi, I had limited map view to tables with <= 100 rows because the geolocation from Google was going very slowly, and that was interfering with how the system is currently designed. I just bumped that

Any news or update on this? Thanks, Anthony

Fyi, there are two options for reporting - to the moderator(s) and to GIO support. Pete

Reporting a mesage seems over the top in most cases. First level complaint should always be to the owners/moderators. Then, if dissatisfied, raise the ante. Options at set up should include usable by

I can also see the merit of this, if provided as an option in group settings. For my own groups, I wouldn't want "reply to Owner" (or whatever we would call it) to appear in an email footer link or

It is odd that if a Moderator bans a member, their pending message instantly vanishes (deleted). But if "system" (Groups.io) bans a member, their pending message remains, waiting for approval. I've

I agree that leaving pending messages rather than just deleting them when a member leaves or is removed (or even banned) from a group can be useful. You don't wipe out all traces of past members.

I understand that, and I already addressed that. That was waaay back. We already clarified that. Andy

Well, a rejected message doesn't need the word "pending" because that's implied. I have no further interest in this. I was merely trying to clarify for you, since you asked "what's the difference,"

J, It makes no difference how the pending message was deleted or rejected, nor whether the member was banned or not banned or removed or not removed. The whole point of my suggestion is this: to add

That was not mentioned in your OP, which in fact only referred to "rejecting" the message. You are now starting to clarify the situation. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

I just had this happen a few days ago when a member posted a moderated message, then left. After I approved the message, it was posted to the group as normal. The entry in the log says "approved 's

In case anyone cares, I probably need to correct something I wrote: The underlined portion above might not be correct. Substitute this phrase: "but definitely if the member was Banned by system". It