If it were, wouldn't that make telephone directories illegal? Are there plans to have a book burning of all old telephone directories held in libraries? -- Steve Hayes E-mail:

I wonder whether the simple existence of an email address on a site can be considered personal information, especially if not linked somehow to a real name. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

Forget it for tonight. I've just scanned a relevant part of that GDPR and it seems to go in circles. Another day; another viewpoint. thanks for asking, bob -- Bob Bellizzi FuchsFriends@groups.io

I've wiped her except for her email address as one who left and 6 activity notes w/her email address in them. I'm pretty sure that an email address is personal but I don't think even a group owner can

What personal info is in her member record? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

Mark I received an unsubscribe today from a UK person who requested me to remove all personal information per the UK GDPR. Luckily, she unsubscribed prior to any posting. But after removing her from a

To minimize the annoyance factor, you could sort on Status to get the types together and ignore the Accepted section. Duane

I've been trying to see if there's a way to do this, but so far, it doesn't seem that there is. The "Download" feature on the Member page allows for loading all members in a single text file, which

LOL, it got hidden in the collapsed quoted text as I didn't reformat it... >>> J_Catlady via groups.io wrote: >>> member xyz@abc >>> Christos Psarras <christos@...> wrote: >>> member abc@xyz

No, I don’t. Just trying to be helpful, actually. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together.

You just have to be different, don't you? :)

B. “Pending member xyz@abc expired and was deleted.” -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

So to recap, the suggestion is: For non-claimed pending members who expire after 14 days without being approved and get auto-removed from the pending members queue: A. Change the reason text in

So that should be changed to "expired." -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond

The expired member is described as "removed" in the past members list. Cheers, Christos

And did you say this is currently described in some log as “removed”? I think that should be changed to “expired.” Wasn’t sure whether you were talking hypothetically or factually and I have

Good call. My original thought was rejected as in rejected (by the system) but expired is better, self-explanatory. Cheers, Christos

I think there should be. I would make the entry in the past members list say "expired" - not "removed." Currently, rejected members say "rejected" in the Past Members list. -- J Messages are the

I'm not quite sure if this is a bug/omission, or it's by design, in which case I'd suggest to add something about it to the activity log. I had someone in a group apply over 14 days ago. They weren't

Changes to the site this week: October 8, 2021: DOCS: Updates from Nina. BUGFIX: More work to eliminate bogus draft saving error messages. Discussion CHANGE: Removed the Remove option from the Banned