This is just my opinion, but if a log entry is recorded, the message is by definition not private. -- David Bryant Canyon Lake, Texas https://t-vog.groups.io/g/main https://davidcbryant.net

Private responses to group emails never pass through groups.io and therefore cannot be intercepted and logged. It seems appropriate -- or at least consistent -- that private messages sent via the

If someone sends a private reply, it seems the act of sending the message is not logged in the Activity Log. I'm wondering (a) if my understanding is correct, and (b) if it seems right that groups.io

"I have also changed my mind about yesterday's action of changing 'Reply to' to 'Send to', and have reverted the change." After all the good dialogue, I am disappointed. I think 2 reply-tos to for

Hi Andy, I just pushed a couple changes that should hopefully fix this. Thanks, Mark

Hi All, I appreciate the conversation. It doesn't seem to me that any of the proposals are meaningfully better than what we have now. I have also changed my mind about yesterday's action of changing

Hi All, I've gone ahead and made the change where unbanning someone does not generate a new past member record. I have also removed the `Remove` option on the Banned Members page, it was mostly a

I honestly have no idea if something was changed or not, I have not had to use the ban functionality before and I only did a couple of tests with a single test user yesterday, but I did notice

May I also request ... says he hoping he isn't asking for something that's already there ... a way to search (for a person or email) all the member lists of all the groups I have access to the

I'm with Chris; we have our group default set for a reason and don't want it changed unnecessarily. Carol

Hi, I would like one page to visit where I can see all pending messages for all of my mailing lists. Right now, I can see that I have a dozen or so pending messages (mostly spam) across all of my

Thank you!-- Ry Jones Community Architect, Hyperledger Chat: @rjones Calendar

It would also (d) remove the set Default Reply Option that Owners currently have as pointed out in my #30478, and I think that would be a mistake. I will readily agree that it would look very neat,

That's not how it was. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

As I've said, I was quite happy with how it was. I never found it confusing and I've not had any comments from any of my members about that either. I think the root cause of this issue is that the

Shal, You were very clear. I feel like either one is too wordy. I also think Send to Member works great with Send to Group in the other case. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

I wrote: I may not have been clear, but my intent was that only one of those two phrases appear, the one matching the color of the button. J wrote: You probably understood my intent, but seeing

"Send to Sender" reminds me of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros ^^^snake eating its own tail But I think Shal's idea goes too far in the direction of wordiness. I would just go back to

J wrote: I'm not fond of "Send to Sender" either, for much the same reason. How about just "Send", with a fuller explanation in text below the button: "Send your reply to the group" (button

Mark, One observation, I don't know if the notice list screen is supposed to remember what column sort the user has selected, but no matter what sort one selects, after updating or deleting a notice