What if there was a note indicating that the message had been edited by a particular user on a particular date? That might curb potential abuse.

Hi Mark, the second item is two separate options, right? Judy F. SW Florida - USA

Hi Ronaldo, I think this is a wonderful feature of Groups.io. A careless moderator, for instance, might approve a message containing a broken link. Being able to fix the link would help members who

- Can now edit archived messages. Edit and Delete buttons now appear in the Inbox view. - In the pending message page, there's now an 'Approve & Unmoderate Sender' for messages from members who are

markf@corp.groups.io sendis: Err... WHO can edit WHICH messages? I don't see a problem with moderators editing messages *before* they're sent out, or members deleting their OWN messages, but

​Laurence, I'm not a Facebook devotee and I far prefer lengthy prose to vestigial comments. But I feel you do Facebook a disservice in lumping it together with Twitter and the like. I would dispute

​Hi Mark, I've just confirmed on a dummy group that only originators and moderators can edit messages. It seemed to work very slickly. regards, Ian​ --

I've just pushed to the site the ability to edit archived messages. Also, the Edit and Delete buttons now also appear when viewing messages in the Inbox view. Let me know if you see any

What shouldn't be added is anything that makes life more dificult for the users. I'm thinking of things like ambiguous and ineffective search engines, non-intuitive user profiles (if it's thought

I have set my family group on groups.io to Posts to this group do not require approval from the moderators. I assumed this meant unmoderated. So no, I wouldn't see every message, at least not right

- Fixed the bug with archive messages being collapsed when they shouldn't be - Moved the permalink 'Link' icon from the bottom of the message to the top - Fixed a logic problem for groups that only

Hi Judy, I didn't read what Ian and the others said as chastising and I'm sure they didn't mean it to be taken that way. I absolutely want discussion about what should and shouldn't be added to

Ian and others, I don’t want to turn this into a debate, but I don’t think you really understood what I said. I have commented several times what a great job Mark is doing with Groups.io and also

Feet in both camps, with the modification that these days, you have to include the mobile viewer (which we don't really do yet). I don't want Groups.io to ever lose its email groups base and strong

Hey, wait a minute! ;-) I'm on that short list too. The ability to edit past posts is on Mark's to-do list. Linda -------------------------------------------------- LAurence wrote:

I suspect it's only thee and me that knows this, judging by the number of FB posts correcting previous typos. -- rgds LAurence <><

There is also another matter to consider here when making comparisons with Yahoo Groups, Google Groups and Facebook. When is the last time you saw the owner of any of these corporations posting how

I completely disagree that the IO Groups service now present is a Facebook clone. The aspects that I am using for the group that I have on this server is very much like Yahoo Groups in the way it

​should read​ ​I beg Mrs Meyer's pardon…​ ​Oh, and with FB you can edit a post when you spot an error…​

Dear Judy, If you wish to critique Facebook/the new Yahoo groups, it might be helpful to focus on the aspects of them you don't like. Like, is it the complexity? - Chris