On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 03:53 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: Yes, I will be fixing the Send to/Reply to inconsistency. I was asking about Send to Sender changed to something else, because yes, that sounds a

I see what’s going on here, and agree with J’s discussion. But I don’t care for “Author”. How about “Member” - that IS where it’s being directed - to that member.

Thanks Mark. Now see your point. I think, still, I would retain sender. Me thinks changing terminology is a bigger problem. I don't think "author" is used elsewhere. Consider Better, not Bigger. So

Yes, I will be fixing the Send to/Reply to inconsistency. I was asking about Send to Sender changed to something else, because yes, that sounds a bit weird. Mark

It IS the sender. It is probably the author. FURTHER, "sender" is what you use in many other contexts -- why introduce another inconsistency. Reply to sender is everywhere. And then "Reply to Sender"

I like “send to author”. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

I think "Sender" is the more recognized. But, the main point is that if "private" is chosen, and even reclicked, "Send" reverts back to "Reply" for both cases. ~Mike

Hmmmm. How about 'Send to Author'? Mark

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 06:12 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: I've changed the `Reply` word to `Send`If you start a reply and then hit the Private button twice it changes back to 'Reply to Group'. There's

Mark, Thanks. All of that makes perfect sense! I suspected something like that, except for the creation timestamp. A couple of suggestions at this point: 1. Figure out whether, and when, Active

Hi All, After looking at what Gmail does, I've changed the `Reply` word to `Send` for the various reply button combos (ie it's now `Send to Group`). Hope this helps. Mark

Hi J, What happened is that member notices really shouldn't have an empty name ("name not set"). That bug was fixed last December. When you added the new member notice, we went in and updated the old

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 08:38 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: monthly reminders.I think I've been MIA. I never knew we had "monthly reminder" notices! That and multiple active welcome messages is going to

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 08:37 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote: I think I have fixed this. Please check it and let me know.Mark, I am very sorry to tell you this, but there are now other weirdnesses! I just

All member notice types can have only one active, with two exceptions: the welcome message and monthly reminders. Thanks, Mark

Hi J, I think I have fixed this. Please check it and let me know. Thanks, Mark

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 07:17 AM, Chris Jones wrote: A single person not understanding what is in front of them does not suggest that non - understanding of these particular functions is widespread.It

A couple of thoughts, Chris: A single person REPORTED the problem. After much dialog with that person, It is clear to me that it can, and therefore should, be improved. I believe if an app requires

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 01:17 PM, I wrote: A single person not understanding what is in front of them does not suggest that non - understanding of these particular functions is widespread.Further to

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 01:05 PM, Mike Hanauer wrote: I think if an extra word or two adds clarity or insight, it is well worth while.Impossible to argue against that, but given that your original post