We receive sometimes dozens of non-member messages daily. I would not want them in the Log. I might accept having them sent to me by email (but I would probably opt-out of receiving them, after the

I feel that an +owner message received from someone who never subscribed is nearly as valuable as a rejected message from someone who is. Although I remain hesitant to go down this road, but if we're

Chris, yes, the rejection notice (if sent) says “the message is included below.” and is in an attachment. This still requires sorting thru emails, often long past the days of the emsils, to

Does the Bcc Moderators function of a Rejection Notice not provide that capability? OK it might require "other mods" to read the original message from their Inboxes but is that a hardship? Chris

To clarify: I am suggesting recording only messages that were rejected by moderators (i.e., becaus of problematic content). I would not record any messages rejected by the system, including spam,

As I said, I would NOT record any of the cateogories Bruce mentioned, all of which are non-member messages, and that includes spam. (Maybe you didn't read past my unfortunate typo?;) -- J Messages

re: "How about logging it only if the reason for the rejection wasn't the size?" Where do you draw the line? If a typical spam message is 3 screenfuls of junk or ads, do you want all of that saved in

That's the current problem: they are currently available in emails only (in the "pending message needing approval" notification or in the rejection notice if bcc'd to moderators). And that's very

Sorry, big typo there - should read "you would NOT record" -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Thinking about this a bit more -- Personally I find the Activity Log best when it is just a nutshell of what happened, in the most concise form. I wouldn't want it to show me all the details. As it

That's a great point. But I would like to be able to see the whole thing. Sometimes the "whoppers" in these rejected messages come at the end. How about logging it only if the reason for the rejection

I understand that concern and was expecting that comment. I thought about it myself. We don't, for example, log deleted messages. I do think that rejected messages are especially important to be able

Hmm. This could be problematic. A message might be rejected because it is too large - Megabytes. Obviously you don't want all of that saved to the log. Maybe just the first line or two? Andy

J -- I can understand why this might be valuable to a group Owner to monitor those who have been assigned Moderator responsibilities...are they being too restrictive/liberal, etc. At the same time,

Yes, I think you’re misunderstanding. The log contains the text of the rejection message, but not the text of the message that was rejected. I’m suggesting the latter. The rejected message is not

If I reject a pending message, the text of any rejection message is clearly shown in the activity log: Am I misunderstanding what you are referring to? Andy

The most likely thing that springs to mind is that your user is blocking cookies from Groups.io. When you log on, Groups.io sets a small first-party cookie with an authorisation token. Every

I have a user, only one I know of, who has to sign on every time he goes to another message. So he goes from message A and tries to view message B, IO makes him sign on again. It is like the

Have a good one; as ever you have earned it! Chris

Changes to the site this week: August 10, 2021: APP: Submitted a new version of the app for Apple app store review. INTERNAL: Work on improving our app deploy system. BUGFIX: Several draft saving bug