A member of our list is the global cyber security lawyer for Verizon Media, which includes aol and yahoo. She has offered to help and to bring in their trust and safety investigations team. Mark- if

Interesting new development, which you (Mark) probably see already -- I see a few addresses that subscribe, then change their address to @AOL. Then a few days later they do it again, and again. I'm

>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 07:24 AM, J_Catlady wrote:all groups allow mods to edit<<< Yes and that’s inconsistent with the (stated?) goal. Perhaps I wasn’t clear. My point is if the policy

>>YSWT<< Dano That wasn't supposed to be an anacronym, It was to be a reply to "YSWT" DUH! Boy, I wish I could Edited that and Saved w/o Sending LOL!!! I would bet that in the hierarchical view,

Hi Mark, the date formats in the cal-reminder messages don't always use local preferences. They are OK on my main group and another subgroup I checked but on two other subgroups they are in US rather

YSWT wrote: For example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/shalf/10130294473/in/album-72157636272401705/ Sort of a combination of the single message

Sorry to be a pest, but bumping this up again - it has consequences for my group and my guess is it's a 10-second fix: Thanks for the considleration. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

Hi Larry, That sounds like what moderators are right now? Owners have full permissions, moderators have (potentially) limited permissions. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding? I appreciate the offer! The

Hi Mark, New guy here (but long time user, love the product). One thought I had was would it be possible to create the role of "helper" which was like a moderator but when you set that role up, you

> YBWT > > I don’t recall that- > was it a hierarchical view, showed precisely which message a reply as to, not just chronologically slapped on the list? > would be a valuable feature as an

YBWT I don’t recall that- was it a hierarchical view, showed precisely which message a reply as to, not just chronologically slapped on the list? would be a valuable feature as an available (not

all groups allow mods to edit -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

But all groups allow mods to save without sending. You can't stop that. My group and all the groups I'm in have disallowed editing by non-mods. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

join our group to find out! <grin> this group doesn’t allow edits and it’s not an impossible hurdle - just resend, delete the first No [edit allowed] or [save and send] would be consistent

Hi Mark, While testing the Split topic function I found that each reply via email to messages that have been split off to a new topic ends up creating a new topic. I've been able to repeat this with

Well, let us know what you decide. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

One can also paste in an image (although that's not always successful/holds its place.) If I edit/resend (or even not resend) I put a note [EDIT] - to indicate what was changed. Typically not, if

Have you opened your group web page under "Topic" view and clicked on a thread to open it? That sounds like what you're looking for. Dano > Implement threaded view like Yahoo groups used to have

Implement threaded view like Yahoo groups used to have before 'neo'. That would be my dream....

In addition what Bruce said, the payer will also be able to see details on their Account > Billing page. Andy