New topic started as suggeste - awaiting approval. Jeremy

Hi Mark, Here's another FollowingOnly weirdness I noticed a couple of days ago, and it probably has to do with the same logic/code area you worked on to fix this similar FO messages

Check out last year's discussion on membership searches as it may provide more info. Andy

It does looks like it's looking for *T*O*M*, (not *TOM*), in that order, but anywhere in the text (addy+domain), and only for email addresses: I tried it on a 5-member test group, and it only

While I had not encountered this situation yet, I’ll agree with Christos on this one. ‘Nit-picking grammar’ has been a forte of mine for some time. Dan Tucker, Groups.io AFDRetiree’s

Hi Mark, This is just the (nit-picky) grammarian in me, but this dialog question text could stand to be rearranged: Changing it to "Set [this/these] x group[s]

Jeremy, The lack of displaying the information is a new bug. We should probably keep this topic focused on the search issue only. Why don't you start a new topic for the failure to display the search

Hi Mark, When editing a calendar event, using the Back button at the bottom of the page causes a blank calendar screen due to a malformed calstart parameter in the URL. The current format is

A quick test on one of my groups found lots on searching for tom (t anywhere, including only after the @ (e.g. in hotmail.com), with ~om at end, or matching *o*omot*@*.*o.* (changing all other

Sarah, What a great find. I tried "som" and it found all that have an "s" anywhere in the email and end in "om". It did not pick up on a name with s in it. Then I tried "pam" to find "Paige" and

Typing tom seems to bring up all those with a t anywhere and ending .com Typing gom, jom etc seems to bring up all those with a go, jo etc anywhere and ending .com I haven't checked the whole

While that will work for Display names, it doesn't include email addresses. Unless/until Mark has a chance to figure out what's going on, try including the search term in quotes - "tom". It also

Thanks Duane, I obviously overlooked that detail. Hmmm, but maybe there is another way to achieve that intent. Maybe with an “Unsubscribe” – although worded differently – choice. Open, dead

It seems to me that could cause other complications. The Confirmation of Email Address is sent by the system, so any replies wouldn't be seen by any group. As it works, that would be seen as

Try Tom*. I do quite a lot of searches in one of my groups for TV model numbers. I always have to add a * wildcard at the end as quite often extra characters are at the end, eg 21AX2100EZ may only

IMHO, if you’re going to change anything in this – I’ve already done some workaround on it – I would include this minor change: “If you are not interested, or if [Invitee Email Address]

I have just done the same in 2 groups; one of 1977 members and another of 43. The first produced 740 returns and the second 17. What is perhaps even weirder is that these represent 37.4% and 39.5% of

I have often found "weidness" in search results which I could not explain. The search for "tom" is the wildest, but the cause of its returning so many false positives may explain others. Consider

I did a download on the members and searched through the csv file for the string tom and got no hits. So there is nothing in the data that would trigger this search. Searching for the string "com"

Without any more to go on but the apparent ‘consistency’ of both of your comments – I wonder if there’s something in the membership group or subgroup name that’s being found. I know that if