What good is 20 GB if it's limited to message attachments? Most of what I've seen discussed in this context is not insufficient storage, but loss of features, specifically files and photos and

A warning message would be a good stop gap for now. It would have saved me, and no doubt others, a lot of headaches. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

So, a simple warning message about not using the back button would seem to suffice then. I expect it on any site where I've made some input and knowing that it may happen is more than enough reason

Mark . . . <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote: I'm not sure that most of his post explained it well, but I think he was suggesting a plan between premium and basic. Maybe call it enhanced (doesn't matter

The fact that in some cases drafts are lost if you use the back button I think is pretty bad, unless a warning is issued, which some sites with that problem do. You don’t expect it in groups.io. --

There are plenty of sites where using the back button causes problems, especially e-commerce sites when online payments are being made. For that reason I just right-click the browser tab for the page

I suggest joining the app subgroup. The app is still being developed. We just rolled out the ability to approve/reject pending messages. Thanks, Mark

I'm not sure I understand what you're arguing for. Are you saying that the free plan needs to have more storage, so that we'll get more groups (of the kind that will only use our free plan)?

Has there been any update on when the Groups.io mobile app will transition from testing to active usage?

Maybe a better title is; Losing Ground to #Google. A treasurer-CoOwner informed me that he wrote IO, suggesting an intermediate step between 1 & 20 Gigs. He WANTS to contribute to IO, and see it

Shouldn't even have to do that. Let's just hope Mark finds a way to fix the bug. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for

Why don't you use a simple text editor such as Notepad instead of Word? No formatting problems then because there's no formatting. Jim Fisher

The real problem is the inconsistent behavior. If we leave the site entirely, the draft gets saved. And we (users) have become accustomed to that. So when we don't even leave the site and do something

Please, don't give Mark any ideas. All of that is cumbersome. We need this fixed. ;) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours,

J_Catlady wrote: There should never be a need to leave the draft page to look something up. All of the major browsers support multiple tabs, so if you need to look something up, you can either: -

Good to know. However, not using the back button is going to be really cumbersome. Imagine you're writing a long, complex reply, and you have to go out of your draft several times to look something up

I'm using FF, so I think this may be the biggy. I've never seen the problem, but always go through the Drafts option on the left menu to get to one. Thanks, Duane

Thanks, Mark, for nailing this down. That’s exactly what happens. I do use Firefox. I’ll try to remember to keep two separate windows open on groups.io until you come up with a fix. Not using the

Hi All, I've spent a bunch of time researching this and trying to reproduce it. Here is what I believe is the bug: - Using Firefox (it's not reproducible in Chrome or Safari), start a reply to a

Once I even noticed it was going on, I used to write them back and ask them how they were replying privately within a thread, because we have PM’s disabled in my group and the replies were clearly