Just an update since that time, the problem still persists. Cheers, Christos

As long as it is clearly documented, I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with a moderator able to send under the owner's imprimatur. When I was in business, I frequently designated an assistant

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 06:44 AM, Andy Wedge wrote: A Moderator with as many permissions as an Owner can give them, is still a Moderator, not an Owner and being able to send messages with a From

Hi, I tried to search to see if this has been raised before, but I couldn't see it. Any chance we could have an option of weekly or monthly summaries? Rather just daily. Cheers Mo

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 09:33 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: select replying from the +owner address, if you're a moderator.This approach is incorrect as far as I'm concerned. There are three distinct

Excellent; many thanks for that. Chris

Hi All, The reply form now has a selector to select replying from the +owner address, if you're a moderator. Cheers, Mark

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:20 PM, J_Catlady wrote: Then lets propose it as a feature. Do you want to do it?Not really. :-) Bruce

Things have actually gotten worse since the member started using "reply all" instead of "reply." So I am now strongly urgng Bruce's proposed fix. What's happening now is that the member thoughtfully

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 07:35 AM, Bruce Bowman wrote: audit trail ... to include any changes made while in pending status.Yes, that makes perfect sense to me. Allow moderators to edit arbitrarily,

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Bowman wrote: I'd be happy to discuss this further but if we're not going to propose this as a feature it should probably be taken oThen lets propose it as a

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:31 AM, J_Catlady wrote: Thanks, this is awesomely informative. Yes, that seems to be what's happening. It's actually amazing that it hasn't been happening more often. I do

Bruce, Thanks, this is awesomely informative. Yes, that seems to be what's happening. It's actually amazing that it hasn't been happening more often. So far, I've noticed it only with this one group

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:48 PM, J_Catlady wrote: However, in this case, there seems to be something unique about the one group member's email situation. Hard to know what it is. The "reply" behavior

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:26 PM, Bruce Bowman wrote: In particular, multiple email clients are known to fail to comply with RFCC 5322, at least by default. Instead of honoring the Reply-to: line,

With the exception of the "reply only to sender" topic setting*, there is no way for groups.io to actually force a particular reply behavior on each and every group member. The reply-to setting for a

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:03 PM, J_Catlady wrote: she’s not doing that. She’s simply hitting “reply.”In other words, her email is filling in the individual's address instead of the group

True but she’s not doing that. She’s simply hitting “reply.” -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be

Nothing to do with settings. If I compose a message in my email, typing the group's or an individual's address in the "to"box decides where it is going AFAIK, reply-all goes to all the addresses the

But wait a sec: should group members be able to loophole out of a group's "disable other reply options" using settings in their email? Also, I'm not sure (aka: I have not the vaguest idea) how these