I think this is a remarkably uncharitable view, especially given the prevalence of the problem and the fact that sometimes it is not of their own creation precisely. For example, in some of the

Then I would argue that it is a problem of their own creation, I'm afraid. Chris

Hi Andy, >>> See the member's manual for details... Yeah, but it's not quite clear in that section of what would happen, so I just sent a message to the docs subgroup about it,

Thanks, Andy. Best, Glenn -- PG&E Delenda Est Virus-free. www.avast.com

Yah, couldnt agree more. Several members have multiple emails and have this problem. lloyd lehrer, (310)951-9097

Oh, hey, you're right, I totally missed that. Many thanks, Glenn -- PG&E Delenda Est Virus-free. www.avast.com

This facility already exists in your account preferences.You can define an alias to your main account address and Groups.io will allow posting from it. This is a send only alias as all outgoing

Glenn, This capability does exist; go to your account settings (upper right) and in the Login screen, look at the bottom for Advanced Settings For Email Aliases. Add your alias

So to set the use case, almost all of the members of one of my groups are email only. For them, it is pretty much just a mailing list. However, we do make extensive use of the Files section

Hi Mark, a member of one of my subgroups uploaded a file and a file-notice message was generated with the file-notice hashtag. I have moderated the hashtag so it was held as expected for approval. I

I am part of a small non-profit group of about 30 members that I have set up a pilot GIO for, however, with the limit of no sub-groups for the basic plan, it makes things more difficult to achieve an

Hello - Thank you for groups.io! I love it - however, the small groups I am in cannot afford $20/month and don't need everything in the Premium tier. Right now we are using the Basic (free) version.

Sorry for the many typos in that, particularly the question at the end- should read “should it be saved as the editor’s draft OR the original poster’s draft.” And the clear answer is that it

It is supposed to work that way for drafts of messsges, and does. So you get used to and expect that behavior. The problem is that it does *not* work that way for drafts of edits of pending messages.

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this how it's supposed to work? At least, that's how it works for me - if I'm writing a message and go to another page before sending it, the message immediately

No, edits of pending messages are not currently saved. But thanks. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be

If you are describing what I think you are then the draft can be made to reappear - at least as a Draft down the left hand side of the web UI - by refreshing the page. Click on that then proceed as

Hi Mark, I run into two minor issues yesterday, one reproducible, the other one a weird one which I cannot reproduce. The reproducible one first; during generation of the notification's message body

Actually I think I did not make the situation very clear. The request is for drafts of edits of *pending* messages to be saved if the edit window is exited. In my own case, I am editing my own pending

This has happened to me more than once: I compose a long reply to a group member, including nuances about medication dosages, lab reports, etc., start to edit it for correctness and details before