Michael, I never thought you did. I was applying that label to my own statement, not to anything you said. On the contrary, if a member doesn't know how to use the available features, then they can

I called no names. My intent was to be anything but impudent, impertinent, insolent, cheeky, audacious, or in any way rude. I was acknowledging that some people might like these Notifications. I do

I was so late to this party that the above just struck me. I didn't realize, until looking more closely at my group's hashtag page just now, where I was at first perplexed to see that they ALL have

Bob, Of course! I certainly wasn't advocating that anyone respond impudently to their membership. That label was intended as mark that statement as having a point, but one that would probably not

Mark, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/25444 A suggestion for #wiki-notice In the body text of the notification include the Reason text (from the "Write a small message here explaining the

Hi All, I've made a couple small changes. The following notification hashtags have been changed: #file is now #file-notice #photo is now #photo-notice #chat is now #chat-notice #wiki is now

Demands to people we are trying to help won't sit well and will likely increase optional unsubscribes plus those for marking messages as spam. Many groups here serve their stakeholders at the

>> Now, if you wanted to needlessly increase complexity, give owners a switch to set their global/list preference to create a setting during a random time frame which they must manually set and reset.

The reason I don't want my members to see some files is because I may be preparing to send out something in a day and need to be prepared. This particularly handy if I know I am going to be too busy

Yes, locked by default or even by constraint, I’ve suggested that in one of these threads. And I think that edit options on these notification tags should generally be restricted to what’s

Chris, I disagree. The subject text of a notification for a Wiki page includes the page's Title, and the body text contains a link to the page. Those seem perfectly adequate as discussion starters. In

I am going to take Shal's comment out of its original context to raise another related point: should Notification Hashtags be Locked by default? IMHO replies to Notifications make no sense, but at

Hi Mark, I have similar reasons to J's comments. I can upload files at various times that can be background or historical information and I don't want a notice going out for each one. I may send a

Michael, Impudent response: sounds like your members need to learn what the Mute link in the message footer is for. In fact I don't have a problem with having a group option to Mute the new system

Carol, I think "we don't use hashtags" is a different class of problem, one which has its own topics here in beta (owners requesting ways to turn them off altogether). Would a group Permissions

Oooh, I like this. I think tying this to a randomly generated hashtag would also be good. Also, the randomly generated hashtag would often be composed of swear words in the group's native language.

Please give us the option to advise our members of uploaded files. Sometimes I don't want them to know about it at the time of uploading but I am preparing for a future event in the Group. Please put

> Isn't the whole point of uploading files being that your members can then access them? I'm confused. Mark Good point, but as daid, sorta No. Point being, A nice option. Historically, YahOops had a

Hi Duane, couldn't have said it better myself. I think with the large number of groups here, changes need to be taken into consideration so all groups have options to use or not use the

Hello, The bug where a hashtag with No Email set would not generate a notification has been fixed. Thanks, Mark