Andy, do you mean actual emails were sent out to group members, or do you mean that a message was sent to the subgroup? "No email" just means (for a normal hashtag) that the messages in the tagged

I agree. The system hashtags could/should be set to "use by moderators only." Other attributes of them could/should also be set by default by the system, such as the ones that don't really apply (e.g.

Mark -- I'm thinking that we need some way to distinguish between the system-generated notification and a message with the #file or #wiki added by a subscriber. In the former case, I might want to

Yes, separate block. I'm about to go back and revisit Mark's question about whether notifications should be in a separate place, or something. I did not even understand the question at that point

Mark, I don't know how many people browse privately as a matter of course, but I suspect it might be non-trivial. I'm thinking you might consider adding something to the effect of "(Some browsers do

Mark I am pleased to see that the Notify Members checkbox when a file isuploaded is now checked by default. I would be unhappy if the feature wasremoved as I periodically move files around from one

Actually I tested it only for the #wiki tag, and my prior message refers to that. It needs to be tested for all of them at this point. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially

That is a double bug, because if you check "no email," the push notification is silenced. It's stated that the push only goes out whenever an email goes out. So evidently, push thinks the email didn't

Hi Mark, just in case this point got lost in the long discussions about the new notifications I thought I'd raise it separately. The 'No email' attribute is ignored on the #file hashtag. I had 'no

Exactly. That would be great. Victoria

Agreed. There has to be a way to turn each notification off, either completely, and/or per action (as with uploading files), and/or sending just to moderators. Preferably all of those options. The

In scrolling down the replies to this thread I don't see if there is a way for wiki edit notifications to reach only mods and owners. I don't want everyone in my group getting a wiki notification for

Hi Jean this was reported earlier in this topic and Mark mentioned it had been fixed for new notifications https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/25391 If your message with the link was generated

Mark—First, my extreme gratitude for the rollout of notifications. Got the first notification of an uploaded photo, and then clicked to be taken to the photo and got a 404 error that the photo

On one of my groups, I had a tag named #File that I've changed to #Files. If I hadn't, no telling how it would have reacted with the notification system. Duane

As the number of system hashtags seems to be growing, it would also be help to have them clearly identified on the hashtags page - perhaps by listing them in a separate block. Andy

Mark, I'm concerned about the name space collision with user-generated and used hashtags of the same names. This wasn't a big problem with the calendar events as those tags have a distinct form

Mark, Most people no, but moderators who moderate by web might well use them as a prompt to go see what happened. As a primarily email user I'll be getting push notices for them from my email

Mark, Seems like something your database could answer. My "why don't they just" moment: query for all page updates, group by page, compute the interval between updates, histogram the results. This

I see the fallacy of this proposal now. The second screen is for non-mods to mute etc. I'm giving up and going to bed. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy