|
moderated
Standardise links at bottom of Daily Summary and Full Digest Emails
#suggestion
Hi,
I think it would be helpful to have the Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links shown at the bottom of the Daily Summary email also shown at the bottom of a Full Digest to provide a
Hi,
I think it would be helpful to have the Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links shown at the bottom of the Daily Summary email also shown at the bottom of a Full Digest to provide a
|
By
Andy Wedge
·
#25103
·
|
|
moderated
New topic Send and Discard buttons not working after using New Topic link in Daily Summary
#bug
Hi Mark,
a Daily Summary contains Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links at the bottom. After using the New Topic link a new topic window is shown but the Send and Discard buttons don't work
Hi Mark,
a Daily Summary contains Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links at the bottom. After using the New Topic link a new topic window is shown but the Send and Discard buttons don't work
|
By
Andy Wedge
·
#25102
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Yes! Was definitely riffing on him. You got it! š»--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together.
Yes! Was definitely riffing on him. You got it! š»--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#25101
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Are you riffing T.S. Eliot's The Naming of Cats? If so, I approve.
Best,
Glenn
--
PG&E Delenda Est
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Are you riffing T.S. Eliot's The Naming of Cats? If so, I approve.
Best,
Glenn
--
PG&E Delenda Est
Virus-free. www.avast.com
|
By
Glenn Glazer
·
#25100
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Divining intent is a perilous matter
When multiple plausible meanings exist.
Some people may just mean to clean up their chatter
But just by pure chance they make others quite pissed.
--
Divining intent is a perilous matter
When multiple plausible meanings exist.
Some people may just mean to clean up their chatter
But just by pure chance they make others quite pissed.
--
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#25099
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
I think divining intent from semantics is a perilous business, in particular when there are multiple plausible intents.
Some people may intend to start a new thread by changing the
I think divining intent from semantics is a perilous business, in particular when there are multiple plausible intents.
Some people may intend to start a new thread by changing the
|
By
Glenn Glazer
·
#25098
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Folks,
If you change the subject line you probably intend to start a new thread. The problem is when you mail client changes the subject.
In the past, but perhaps not on āgroups.ioā I have
Folks,
If you change the subject line you probably intend to start a new thread. The problem is when you mail client changes the subject.
In the past, but perhaps not on āgroups.ioā I have
|
By
Dave Wade
·
#25097
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Malcolm Austen:
Indeed.
I thought the question was asked as to how messages can be threaded correctly if they have no subject line.
I attempted to answer that in such a case they can be threaded
Malcolm Austen:
Indeed.
I thought the question was asked as to how messages can be threaded correctly if they have no subject line.
I attempted to answer that in such a case they can be threaded
|
By
Malcolm Austen
·
#25096
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
This has been hashed and rehashed an rerehashed in the past and the decision was made to thread topics based on subject line as well, because sometimes they were not threading correctly otherwise. I
This has been hashed and rehashed an rerehashed in the past and the decision was made to thread topics based on subject line as well, because sometimes they were not threading correctly otherwise. I
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#25095
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Malcolm Austen:
I argue the converse. If you want to start a new topic, you should compose a new message. It should be permissible to correct a typo in the subject line without starting a new
Malcolm Austen:
I argue the converse. If you want to start a new topic, you should compose a new message. It should be permissible to correct a typo in the subject line without starting a new
|
By
Malcolm Austen
·
#25094
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
I disagree. If you change the subjectline, it's your intention to create a new thread.
Also, I don't want to copy one of the worst parts of googlegroups:
if you send a reply to a digest about subject
I disagree. If you change the subjectline, it's your intention to create a new thread.
Also, I don't want to copy one of the worst parts of googlegroups:
if you send a reply to a digest about subject
|
By
ro-esp
·
#25093
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
My point was not that it's a groups.io thing. My point was that there may have been no relationship established yet, so it doesn't seem appropriate to me to slap them on the wrist ("please don't send
My point was not that it's a groups.io thing. My point was that there may have been no relationship established yet, so it doesn't seem appropriate to me to slap them on the wrist ("please don't send
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#25092
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
I think even that is too much if a relationship has not yet been established. People DO send blank emails to subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. It's not standard practice or in any way required that all
I think even that is too much if a relationship has not yet been established. People DO send blank emails to subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. It's not standard practice or in any way required that all
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#25091
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Malcolm Austen:
Yes Bruce, there are extra possibilities. The point I intended to make was that even if there is no subject line, messages can be correctly threaded by means of the email
Malcolm Austen:
Yes Bruce, there are extra possibilities. The point I intended to make was that even if there is no subject line, messages can be correctly threaded by means of the email
|
By
Malcolm Austen
·
#25090
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Site updates
#changelog
This has been fixed.
Cheers,
Mark
This has been fixed.
Cheers,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#25089
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Not always. See https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/6321
Bruce
Not always. See https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/6321
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#25088
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Hi,
If they can send emails then they should be able to enter a subject. Thatās not a groups.io thing really, thatās just good behavior in email traffic. I think a rejection is appropriate. And if
Hi,
If they can send emails then they should be able to enter a subject. Thatās not a groups.io thing really, thatās just good behavior in email traffic. I think a rejection is appropriate. And if
|
By
Thomas Gruber
·
#25087
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Given the bouncing if sent via email, I feel even more strongly that owner messages without a subject should be allowed. These are potentially coming from people completely unfamiliar with the group
Given the bouncing if sent via email, I feel even more strongly that owner messages without a subject should be allowed. These are potentially coming from people completely unfamiliar with the group
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#25086
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Emails are (or should be) threaded on the basis of the threading headers, not on the basis of the subject line.
Malcolm.
--
Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@...>
Emails are (or should be) threaded on the basis of the threading headers, not on the basis of the subject line.
Malcolm.
--
Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@...>
|
By
Malcolm Austen
·
#25085
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Yep...a source of annoyance for me.
Topics are supposed to have subjects. Not sure how the threading algorithm is supposed to work without one.
Regards,
Bruce
Yep...a source of annoyance for me.
Topics are supposed to have subjects. Not sure how the threading algorithm is supposed to work without one.
Regards,
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#25084
·
|