|
moderated
Re: Infinite Scroll on Databases
I know this was brought up here in January, but I just noticed that when searching for something in the files of our group, this applies to files as well: Infinite scroll is not possible. If you
|
I know this was brought up here in January, but I just noticed that when searching for something in the files of our group, this applies to files as well: Infinite scroll is not possible. If you
|
By
Victoria
·
#24304
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Remove the ID column in databases
#suggestion
For our dog rescue group, we find the ID number very useful in that it provides integrity for our information, and it gives us an automatic count of the number of dogs that we rescue each year. I
|
For our dog rescue group, we find the ID number very useful in that it provides integrity for our information, and it gives us an automatic count of the number of dogs that we rescue each year. I
|
By
Michelle Lucas
·
#24303
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
Add to that: did my post reach the system? It’s an acknowledgment of receipt, and I think it is sorely lacking.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My
|
Add to that: did my post reach the system? It’s an acknowledgment of receipt, and I think it is sorely lacking.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24302
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
Exactly. Those are all great reasons!
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
|
Exactly. Those are all great reasons!
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24301
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
If I might add another reason to have a "Pending Message" notification:
I am currently a member of 6 groups, 3 that fall into the general subset that this one does.
Now, granted, most people's memory
|
If I might add another reason to have a "Pending Message" notification:
I am currently a member of 6 groups, 3 that fall into the general subset that this one does.
Now, granted, most people's memory
|
By
Bill Hazel
·
#24300
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
Yes, that would need to be added. And that’s the feature that I requested originally, and which I think would be the most useful, since currently, web posters have no record of a pending message. I
|
Yes, that would need to be added. And that’s the feature that I requested originally, and which I think would be the most useful, since currently, web posters have no record of a pending message. I
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24299
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
As part of the change, a feature would need to be added to show a web-using member the list of posts pending approval to which moderation comments could be attached. (Moderators could even use this
|
As part of the change, a feature would need to be added to show a web-using member the list of posts pending approval to which moderation comments could be attached. (Moderators could even use this
|
By
JohnF
·
#24298
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Remove the ID column in databases
#suggestion
I would be fine with hiding it but, as you know, activity in a database references the row id and, as another has pointed out, uniquely identifies an individual row which is often necessary and very
|
I would be fine with hiding it but, as you know, activity in a database references the row id and, as another has pointed out, uniquely identifies an individual row which is often necessary and very
|
By
Jim Wilson
·
#24297
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
That is a good point. But there still seem to be the other issues/problems.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we
|
That is a good point. But there still seem to be the other issues/problems.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24296
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
How is that possible if the member has posted via the web, since the sender can't see the pending message and has no access to it whatsoever?
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
How is that possible if the member has posted via the web, since the sender can't see the pending message and has no access to it whatsoever?
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24295
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
Yes, if your "claimed" feature is implemented, that could possibly be a way out of the dilemma, as mentioned.
What if instead of actually deleting the message, the member's Delete request operates
|
Yes, if your "claimed" feature is implemented, that could possibly be a way out of the dilemma, as mentioned.
What if instead of actually deleting the message, the member's Delete request operates
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24294
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
Michael,
Depends on what you mean by "moderate" - the first moderator to Edit a pending message gets a "claim" on it. That prevents action by email, but only warns other moderators who attempt to act
|
Michael,
Depends on what you mean by "moderate" - the first moderator to Edit a pending message gets a "claim" on it. That prevents action by email, but only warns other moderators who attempt to act
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24293
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
JohnF,
that's > pending approval?
I like that, if it is kept minimal, like the text box for entering a reason for an edit.
If the idea of treating a Deletion request like a claim is taken up then
|
JohnF,
that's > pending approval?
I like that, if it is kept minimal, like the text box for entering a reason for an edit.
If the idea of treating a Deletion request like a claim is taken up then
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24292
·
|
|
moderated
Re: "Pending Message" notification that could be clicked on to delete it.
#suggestion
J,
If you mean "hard at work writing a rejection note" that's the situation I was addressing recently (#24214); editing a message already claims it.
-----
What if instead of actually deleting the
|
J,
If you mean "hard at work writing a rejection note" that's the situation I was addressing recently (#24214); editing a message already claims it.
-----
What if instead of actually deleting the
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24291
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Remove the ID column in databases
#suggestion
I would love to be able to permanently hide the ID column, which I don't use in my database table of chorus members.
If the ID column is hidden, would tables still be sorted by ID number by default?
|
I would love to be able to permanently hide the ID column, which I don't use in my database table of chorus members.
If the ID column is hidden, would tables still be sorted by ID number by default?
|
By
Nina Eppes
·
#24290
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Remove the ID column in databases
#suggestion
Yeah, I would remove it.
Have a blessed day! Steph
|
Yeah, I would remove it.
Have a blessed day! Steph
|
By
Steph Mathews
·
#24289
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
In my experience, people who are interested in adding a DMARC record for their domain start with setting one up with p=none. Then they go through and audit the reports on their domain. They see that
|
In my experience, people who are interested in adding a DMARC record for their domain start with setting one up with p=none. Then they go through and audit the reports on their domain. They see that
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24288
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/munge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#DNS_record
Best,
Glenn
--
PG&E Delenda Est
|
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/munge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#DNS_record
Best,
Glenn
--
PG&E Delenda Est
|
By
Glenn Glazer
·
#24287
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
This would frustrate our users who receive software patches via the project's mailing list.
Git takes patch author information from e-mail headers. Right now we have git hooks in place on the server
|
This would frustrate our users who receive software patches via the project's mailing list.
Git takes patch author information from e-mail headers. Right now we have git hooks in place on the server
|
By
Michael Halstead
·
#24286
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
It's hard to have objections.... as I don't know what is talked about.
Does anyone care to explain/translate? "munge", "p=" ?
groetjes, Ronaldo
|
It's hard to have objections.... as I don't know what is talked about.
Does anyone care to explain/translate? "munge", "p=" ?
groetjes, Ronaldo
|
By
ro-esp
·
#24285
·
|
