Hi All, Right now, we munge the From line of messages for people who have DMARC records of p=reject or p=quarantine. We do not do that for people who have DMARC records of p=none. I propose changing

Or maybe the can-of-worms-in-the-sky list.;) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

But (ain't there always at least one) how do you know which will be read first? Catch-22. After thinking on it a bit, I don't know if this is really worth pursuing much (of course, that's up to

Seems cleaner and easier for the poster of the message to just send a PM to the group owner address asking them to delete the pending message. My two cents. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

How about a way to attach a note to the moderator for a message that's pending approval? It would only be seen by a moderator who is able to approve the pending message. Then the original author

Re messy: so to fix that, you'd have to do something like a "too late to delete" feature if a mod has already claimed the message. And that's assuming "claimed" even gets implemented. If it doesn't,

Pondering this further, I think what bothers me is the effect on moderators. Someone (or someones, until Shal's "claimed" feature is implemented, if it is) may be hard at work moderating the message

Ok, that's somewhat convincing. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

The same mechanism that would allow one posted online to be deleted. If it's already been approved, their 'sent' list would be empty. Duane

Now I'm thinking (as you may be too) that maybe there should be some such notification when members post via email. If that's added, and a copy of the message sent is also added, that would make

I'm re-posting this list as a suggestion since it didn't get elevated to that level during the changeover. I've tried to keep the list as short as I could to provide functions that would enhance

How would they do that? If they sent it via email, there's no notification that their message will post when approved, no banner, no nothing. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

I don't think it necessarily would. If the message hasn't been approved, the sender could go online and delete it. Maybe that would be a limitation. Duane

I’m all for the most consistency possible between posting via email vs posting via the web. Adding the suggested feature decreases consistency (you can’t take back a sent email) whereas my

How so? Wouldn't it be better to allow the sender to remove the message from the queue than to add clutter by needing to post a "my mistake" followup? In some cases though, I do like having

I'm not sure I understand the middle part of this message, but I do get that the suggestion is for a way to delete a submitted pending message. I would disagree with that feature and think it would be

Add a way to cancel a message before it gets approved. Once i hit "Send" or "Reply to Group" I get the green banner with "Your message will be sent when it's approved by the moderators." but nothing

Another suggestion on a similar theme: it would be awesome if when creating a subgroup, its settings defaulted to matching the parent group's unless manually changed. For example, in my parent group,

We're trying to figure out why a group can't be renamed. While testing, I noticed that if I tried to rename to an existing name, it says "Cannot contain spaces, pluses, periods, or underscores." If

I'm a member of a top-level group that is private. When members create sub-groups, the default visibility setting for the sub-group is "Subgroup listed in parent group, messages publicly viewable". As