|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Thank you for the explanation. The dates of the bouncing events
were spread out over months, not consecutive days so conditions
were not met, as you have
Thank you for the explanation. The dates of the bouncing events
were spread out over months, not consecutive days so conditions
were not met, as you have
|
By
JediPirx
·
#24119
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
The reason I ask is that if you ban by entering the email address, a new member record for the banned account is created (as I understand it), regardless of whether or not the email address was
The reason I ask is that if you ban by entering the email address, a new member record for the banned account is created (as I understand it), regardless of whether or not the email address was
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24118
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
Actually I have a couple that are not NMM. However, all (or nearly all) of the NMM ones did not have that status when banned. One clue is that they're all NMM(3). And all, or nearly all, of them
Actually I have a couple that are not NMM. However, all (or nearly all) of the NMM ones did not have that status when banned. One clue is that they're all NMM(3). And all, or nearly all, of them
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24117
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
In my group they've all become NMM. Did you ban them by the action dropdown, or by entering the email address?
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My
In my group they've all become NMM. Did you ban them by the action dropdown, or by entering the email address?
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24116
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
I'm not seeing that on all of them. On most I see whatever status they had when they were banned.
Duane
I'm not seeing that on all of them. On most I see whatever status they had when they were banned.
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#24115
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Banned not in Banned list
#bug
Mark,
Not only is it still not working, but now, every member of the Banned list shows up as NMM. This is correct for email addresses that were banned without having joined the group, but is not
Mark,
Not only is it still not working, but now, every member of the Banned list shows up as NMM. This is correct for email addresses that were banned without having joined the group, but is not
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24114
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
I think there's a separate thread for that.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
I think there's a separate thread for that.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24113
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
I'm responding to this since the suggestion originally posted on canny was mine: That's not really what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the ability to view/access certain things or not, with
I'm responding to this since the suggestion originally posted on canny was mine: That's not really what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the ability to view/access certain things or not, with
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24112
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Mark,
I wrote:
I hope it is understood that I'm still interested in a resolution to this, my lack of response to some of the advice and comments from others notwithstanding.
Shal
Mark,
I wrote:
I hope it is understood that I'm still interested in a resolution to this, my lack of response to some of the advice and comments from others notwithstanding.
Shal
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24111
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
What he said.....and NO promoted person should be able to oust the original owner.
What he said.....and NO promoted person should be able to oust the original owner.
|
By
Charles Roberts
·
#24110
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
There are lots of non-technical, non-administrative jobs that could use the some of the information that moderators may see but that don't require some of the other privileges/ abilities that are
There are lots of non-technical, non-administrative jobs that could use the some of the information that moderators may see but that don't require some of the other privileges/ abilities that are
|
By
Bob Bellizzi
·
#24109
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
You could read the original suggestion for an understanding of this. There is already some granularity (called "permissions") in what mods can and can't do. The suggestion is for more, and for better
You could read the original suggestion for an understanding of this. There is already some granularity (called "permissions") in what mods can and can't do. The suggestion is for more, and for better
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24108
·
|
|
moderated
Re: More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
I'm not sure what "granularity" means here
You want moderators to decide what they view and what not?
What good is a moderator who can't approve or reject messages, and can't put abusers on
I'm not sure what "granularity" means here
You want moderators to decide what they view and what not?
What good is a moderator who can't approve or reject messages, and can't put abusers on
|
By
ro-esp
·
#24107
·
|
|
moderated
calendar
#suggestion
Ability to send scheduled monthly events. currently when we fill out our calendar 3-6 months in advance, when the month calendar is scheduled, it will send all 3-6 months worth of events. We would
Ability to send scheduled monthly events. currently when we fill out our calendar 3-6 months in advance, when the month calendar is scheduled, it will send all 3-6 months worth of events. We would
|
By
ogqc81
·
#24106
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Is it possible to create a preview of a link?
#suggestion
I posted a prior reply to this but it seems to have poofed. Since then, I have discovered that facebook does preview an image that is in the post being linked. If there is no image in the post, then
I posted a prior reply to this but it seems to have poofed. Since then, I have discovered that facebook does preview an image that is in the post being linked. If there is no image in the post, then
|
By
Tom H
·
#24105
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
I left the bouncing member in the group so that I could see what would happen when the next bounce probe went out four days later. That was today, and sure enough, the bounce of the bounce probe
I left the bouncing member in the group so that I could see what would happen when the next bounce probe went out four days later. That was today, and sure enough, the bounce of the bounce probe
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24104
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Site updates
#changelog
- CHANGE: Standardized on the term `member`; we used `subscriber` and `user` previously. Several
tweaks to the group settings page. Changed NuM to NMM.
- INTERNAL: Much work to support moving from
- CHANGE: Standardized on the term `member`; we used `subscriber` and `user` previously. Several
tweaks to the group settings page. Changed NuM to NMM.
- INTERNAL: Much work to support moving from
|
By
Jim Fisher
·
#24103
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Site updates
#changelog
It is. I just wrote that part of the #changelog before I changed the terminology everywhere.
Thanks,
Mark
It is. I just wrote that part of the #changelog before I changed the terminology everywhere.
Thanks,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24102
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Site updates
#changelog
Should that be NMM instead of NuM?
--
Bob Bellizzi
Should that be NMM instead of NuM?
--
Bob Bellizzi
|
By
Bob Bellizzi
·
#24101
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Ad blocker warning
#misc
It was a classifieds list and the link was to a product. Completely legit.
Mark
It was a classifieds list and the link was to a product. Completely legit.
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24100
·
|