Mark, Not only is it still not working, but now, every member of the Banned list shows up as NMM. This is correct for email addresses that were banned without having joined the group, but is not

I think there's a separate thread for that. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

I'm responding to this since the suggestion originally posted on canny was mine: That's not really what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the ability to view/access certain things or not, with

Mark, I wrote: I hope it is understood that I'm still interested in a resolution to this, my lack of response to some of the advice and comments from others notwithstanding. Shal

What he said.....and NO promoted person should be able to oust the original owner.

There are lots of non-technical, non-administrative jobs that could use the some of the information that moderators may see but that don't require some of the other privileges/ abilities that are

You could read the original suggestion for an understanding of this. There is already some granularity (called "permissions") in what mods can and can't do. The suggestion is for more, and for better

I'm not sure what "granularity" means here You want moderators to decide what they view and what not? What good is a moderator who can't approve or reject messages, and can't put abusers on

Ability to send scheduled monthly events. currently when we fill out our calendar 3-6 months in advance, when the month calendar is scheduled, it will send all 3-6 months worth of events. We would

I posted a prior reply to this but it seems to have poofed. Since then, I have discovered that facebook does preview an image that is in the post being linked. If there is no image in the post, then

I left the bouncing member in the group so that I could see what would happen when the next bounce probe went out four days later. That was today, and sure enough, the bounce of the bounce probe

- CHANGE: Standardized on the term `member`; we used `subscriber` and `user` previously. Several tweaks to the group settings page. Changed NuM to NMM. - INTERNAL: Much work to support moving from

It is. I just wrote that part of the #changelog before I changed the terminology everywhere. Thanks, Mark

Should that be NMM instead of NuM? -- Bob Bellizzi

It was a classifieds list and the link was to a product. Completely legit. Mark

typo, they only see that if they have access to the member list - but the rest holds -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours,

Adding to this: The activity logs (group and member) should also start to have granularity, which should match the moderator viewing granularity that is now in effect or that comes into effect.

But why were those googleadservices links in ther message in the first place? Do we presume it was an open group and some spammer had posted them? Most of us try and avoid these sort of links which

Changes to the site this week: CHANGE: Standardized on the term member; we used subscriber and user previously. Several tweaks to the group settings page. Changed NuM to NMM. INTERNAL: Much work to

Good catch. Fixed! Thanks, Mark