Hello, Yes, this was a bug that I so very thoughtfully introduced on Wednesday as collateral damage from my efforts to deal with the dude who kept trying to subscribe to lots of groups with the bogus

Mark -- GMF members have recently reported difficulties in voluntarily joining an unrestricted subgroup. When they click the "Join this Group" button on the subgroup home page, it forces them to

You didn't catch it on the member record where it says "Override: new user moderated" under Posting Privileges. ;>) Duane

Hi All, As part of the writing process for the manual, our tech writer has been suggesting some changes to make things more consistent. In the group settings page, for example, I use the terms users,

We went through something similar almost 5 years ago with the GIO login page, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/47008 My fault that time. Duane

Hi All, A group owner was having a problem. There were some links in messages that were just not showing up in their browser, both when reviewing pending messages on the website and when viewing the

Mark & All, I just received this message from AT&T in response to the complaint I lodged yesterday (2/6/20). I also gave all my AT&T users (att.net, sbcglobal.net, pacbell.net, etc.) some boilerplate

There was a post yesterday regarding this discovery on GMF. The only thing that can be done is to send emails to: abuse_rbl AT abuse-att.net <<< (the email address cannot be hot-linked here

Mark, My users at prodigy.net are getting the same message as the sbcglobal.net accounts. The error message " ff-ip4-mx-vip1.prodigy.net: 553 5.3.0 flpd575 DNSBL:RBL 521< 66.175.222.12

This also includes the related domains such as att.net (lots of complaints on GMF about this ;>) Duane

Hi All, Since yesterday mid-day, sbcglobal.net has been blocking us. I have attempted to contact them, but no response so far. If you are an sbcglobal.net user, I ask that you contact them as

Duane, Or in other words, according to what you wrote, the probe bounces are possibly not *supposed* to be tracked in the Activity Log; but the experience now (the bug I'm bringing up) is they are

It's been this way for almost 5 years, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/2366 You may have an unlimited, high-speed connection, but not everyone does, including me. You also need to remember

Thanks for the sanity check. I remember someone having requested that they be tracked, and tracking bouncing of the probes could indeed be very useful (as I just wrote in the separate thread about

Based on my limited investigation, you're partially correct. The bounces of the probes wasn't logged in the Activity Log, but was logged in the member's Email Delivery History as of July/August last

Yes, and that's one more reason why you don't need or want further "is bouncing" entries in the group activity log. However, a group activity log entry to the effect that the member is actually

Bounce Probes show up in the individual member's Email Delivery History. Chris

Mark, Sorry for the dribble of thoughts. Things keep occurring to me, but I will stop after this. I think as moderators we do want to know when a bounce probe itself has bounced, so that we can not

John et al, I'd already started a separate topic for the multiple "is bouncing" entries bug. I just posted an update in it, but I'll repeat quickly here and then move over there from now on: After an

Charlie, this confirms my experiment above. The question is, can anybody do anything about the 720x720 downsampling? There must have been, originally, a reason to do this, I'd guess to do with