|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
J,
It seems highly unlikely that even two of them have Suzanne as the user part of their actual email address. That would mean that they have unique email domains. On the other hand ten given names
|
J,
It seems highly unlikely that even two of them have Suzanne as the user part of their actual email address. That would mean that they have unique email domains. On the other hand ten given names
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24032
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Problem with sorting in Emailed Photos folder
#bug
#fixed
i am having the same problem and it is not fixed. If you go to posted i just see blanks after i delete and the blanks stay there. I cant see to organize it in posting and that is what my members look
|
i am having the same problem and it is not fixed. If you go to posted i just see blanks after i delete and the blanks stay there. I cant see to organize it in posting and that is what my members look
|
By
Anita L
·
#24031
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
What if the Display Name for a non-member simply read "Non-member"? If anyone wants to start actively participating in the group, they can join and you can have control over their Display Name.
|
What if the Display Name for a non-member simply read "Non-member"? If anyone wants to start actively participating in the group, they can join and you can have control over their Display Name.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24030
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Oh, so you can't change their Display Name because they have no member record. Interesting situation.
However, I don't know if the masking rule for message bodies should generally be applied to
|
Oh, so you can't change their Display Name because they have no member record. Interesting situation.
However, I don't know if the masking rule for message bodies should generally be applied to
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24029
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Create a setting "edits moderated" as compromise to "disable editing"
#suggestion
p.s. "P" members' edits would, of course, bypass the moderation.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be
|
p.s. "P" members' edits would, of course, bypass the moderation.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24028
·
|
|
moderated
Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Mark,
An admittedly unusual situation, but I've a group where many non-member posters have their email address duplicated in the Display Name field of the From they post with.
This causes their full
|
Mark,
An admittedly unusual situation, but I've a group where many non-member posters have their email address duplicated in the Display Name field of the From they post with.
This causes their full
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24027
·
|
|
moderated
Create a setting "edits moderated" as compromise to "disable editing"
#suggestion
Currently, the only option a group has for controlling edits is to completely disable editing. The suggestion is to create another option, "edits moderated," that causes message edits to go through
|
Currently, the only option a group has for controlling edits is to completely disable editing. The suggestion is to create another option, "edits moderated," that causes message edits to go through
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24026
·
|
|
moderated
When a message edit comes through pending, allow editing of the "reason"
#suggestion
If you or someone edits a message and the edit comes through pending (due to some moderation setting), it's possible to edit the content from within the pending queue, but not the "reason." You can
|
If you or someone edits a message and the edit comes through pending (due to some moderation setting), it's possible to edit the content from within the pending queue, but not the "reason." You can
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24025
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
So Reply to OP may not be completely intuitive either as the FUNCTION of the Private button IS what I'm after. It just needs to be clear what its for and IMO needs to be clear its a reply function at
|
So Reply to OP may not be completely intuitive either as the FUNCTION of the Private button IS what I'm after. It just needs to be clear what its for and IMO needs to be clear its a reply function at
|
By
outlawmws
·
#24024
·
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
INTERNAL: Better tracking of which mechanism a user is added to the system, to aid in spotting shenanigans.
SYSADMIN: Added a lot of storage to increase the amount of
|
Changes to the site this week:
INTERNAL: Better tracking of which mechanism a user is added to the system, to aid in spotting shenanigans.
SYSADMIN: Added a lot of storage to increase the amount of
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24023
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
Haha. I don’t mind, either. I think it actually may have been your post about the “catching up” that pinged my brain this morning. 😊
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
Haha. I don’t mind, either. I think it actually may have been your post about the “catching up” that pinged my brain this morning. 😊
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24022
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
J,
>>> Correct, I just sent that in as a bug/suggestion. Havent seen it come thru yet.
Yours did come through; mine said the same thing pretty-much (except I tagged it as #bug) and probably came
|
J,
>>> Correct, I just sent that in as a bug/suggestion. Havent seen it come thru yet.
Yours did come through; mine said the same thing pretty-much (except I tagged it as #bug) and probably came
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#24021
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
Christos,
Correct, I just sent that in as a bug/suggestion. Havent seen it come thru yet.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in
|
Christos,
Correct, I just sent that in as a bug/suggestion. Havent seen it come thru yet.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24020
·
|
|
moderated
Invitation to join group bug I think
#bug
I just received an invitation to join a group. I accepted the invitation by clicking the link that said accept the invitation
It redirected me to a page with options and then when I scrolled down to
|
I just received an invitation to join a group. I accepted the invitation by clicking the link that said accept the invitation
It redirected me to a page with options and then when I scrolled down to
|
By
Leeni
·
#24019
·
|
|
moderated
"autofollow replies" should behave consistently with explicitly following a thread
#suggestion
Currently, when you explicitly choose to follow a topic, you're sent all the prior emails in that topic (you "catch up" with it). But if you are on autofollow replies, and you reply to a topic, you
|
Currently, when you explicitly choose to follow a topic, you're sent all the prior emails in that topic (you "catch up" with it). But if you are on autofollow replies, and you reply to a topic, you
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24018
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
J,
>>>
Realized that since I’m FF, I saw the original message but not Mark’s, and replied to the original message before seeing Mark’s. Later I saw Mark’s reply online and was momentarily
|
J,
>>>
Realized that since I’m FF, I saw the original message but not Mark’s, and replied to the original message before seeing Mark’s. Later I saw Mark’s reply online and was momentarily
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#24017
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
I totally agree that it's hard to find. There was a long debate over allowing an explicit "PM" (or whatever you want to call it) button that appears contemporaneously with the Reply button, rather
|
I totally agree that it's hard to find. There was a long debate over allowing an explicit "PM" (or whatever you want to call it) button that appears contemporaneously with the Reply button, rather
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24016
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
OK, if that is what it does is a direct reply to the OP then yes - I never noticed it down on the corner like that so it's not intuitive - So I'lI change the ask to move that to a pull down option
|
OK, if that is what it does is a direct reply to the OP then yes - I never noticed it down on the corner like that so it's not intuitive - So I'lI change the ask to move that to a pull down option
|
By
outlawmws
·
#24015
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
Realized that since I’m FF, I saw the original message but not Mark’s, and replied to the original message before seeing Mark’s. Later I saw Mark’s reply online and was momentarily flummoxed.
|
Realized that since I’m FF, I saw the original message but not Mark’s, and replied to the original message before seeing Mark’s. Later I saw Mark’s reply online and was momentarily flummoxed.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24014
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
Just seeing Mark’s reply belatedly. I think I’m missing msgs on my phone. In any case, I had the same reaction: use Private Reply, or I’m missing something.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion
|
Just seeing Mark’s reply belatedly. I think I’m missing msgs on my phone. In any case, I had the same reaction: use Private Reply, or I’m missing something.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24013
·
|
