|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Not so sure about this "fix." In my group there were no less than FOUR "xyz is bouncing via system" log entries on Feb 1 for the same member, who is subscribed via special notices, and just for good
Not so sure about this "fix." In my group there were no less than FOUR "xyz is bouncing via system" log entries on Feb 1 for the same member, who is subscribed via special notices, and just for good
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24040
·
|
|
moderated
Allow both the creator and organizer(s) to edit Calendar events
#suggestion
Moving this idea over from the GMF thread Calendar Question: "Public can view, Subscribers can view and edit" clarification
Simply put, allow both the Creator and Organizer(s) edit Calendar
Moving this idea over from the GMF thread Calendar Question: "Public can view, Subscribers can view and edit" clarification
Simply put, allow both the Creator and Organizer(s) edit Calendar
|
By
Bill Hazel
·
#24039
·
|
|
moderated
Re: A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
As rather suggested by Mark's "fixed" hashtag this problem has been, er, fixed. "Our" Monthly Message goes out as a Special Notice on the 1st of every month and the outcome was that about 72 new
As rather suggested by Mark's "fixed" hashtag this problem has been, er, fixed. "Our" Monthly Message goes out as a Special Notice on the 1st of every month and the outcome was that about 72 new
|
By
Chris Jones
·
#24038
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Ok, now I get it. These people are using their email address for the name portion of their email address. Pretty we’d. I guess I can now see how that qualifies (sort of) as an example of
Ok, now I get it. These people are using their email address for the name portion of their email address. Pretty we’d. I guess I can now see how that qualifies (sort of) as an example of
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24037
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Hi J,
I did a little test - configured an email account and put the email address also into the „name“ field (in Apple mail on iPad actually). Then I sent a message to Groups.io to a group that
Hi J,
I did a little test - configured an email account and put the email address also into the „name“ field (in Apple mail on iPad actually). Then I sent a message to Groups.io to a group that
|
By
Thomas Gruber
·
#24036
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Shal, I think that's correct and that my statement that groups.io harvests and uses the email address as the display name is wrong. I think it harvests, as you reference here, the name that comes
Shal, I think that's correct and that my statement that groups.io harvests and uses the email address as the display name is wrong. I think it harvests, as you reference here, the name that comes
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24035
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
That part is true. Also, I checked and we have 5 Suzannes, 10 Susans, and 5 Sues. :-)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours,
That part is true. Also, I checked and we have 5 Suzannes, 10 Susans, and 5 Sues. :-)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24034
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Exactly. But the display name IS the email address (since groups. io harvests it from any email sent to the group) or blank (if they've sent no email yet) until the member or a mod changes it. And I
Exactly. But the display name IS the email address (since groups. io harvests it from any email sent to the group) or blank (if they've sent no email yet) until the member or a mod changes it. And I
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24033
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
J,
It seems highly unlikely that even two of them have Suzanne as the user part of their actual email address. That would mean that they have unique email domains. On the other hand ten given names
J,
It seems highly unlikely that even two of them have Suzanne as the user part of their actual email address. That would mean that they have unique email domains. On the other hand ten given names
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24032
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Problem with sorting in Emailed Photos folder
#bug
#fixed
i am having the same problem and it is not fixed. If you go to posted i just see blanks after i delete and the blanks stay there. I cant see to organize it in posting and that is what my members look
i am having the same problem and it is not fixed. If you go to posted i just see blanks after i delete and the blanks stay there. I cant see to organize it in posting and that is what my members look
|
By
Anita L
·
#24031
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
What if the Display Name for a non-member simply read "Non-member"? If anyone wants to start actively participating in the group, they can join and you can have control over their Display Name.
What if the Display Name for a non-member simply read "Non-member"? If anyone wants to start actively participating in the group, they can join and you can have control over their Display Name.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24030
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Oh, so you can't change their Display Name because they have no member record. Interesting situation.
However, I don't know if the masking rule for message bodies should generally be applied to
Oh, so you can't change their Display Name because they have no member record. Interesting situation.
However, I don't know if the masking rule for message bodies should generally be applied to
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24029
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Create a setting "edits moderated" as compromise to "disable editing"
#suggestion
p.s. "P" members' edits would, of course, bypass the moderation.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be
p.s. "P" members' edits would, of course, bypass the moderation.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24028
·
|
|
moderated
Hide Email Addresses In Archives fails to mask email addresses in Display Names
#bug
Mark,
An admittedly unusual situation, but I've a group where many non-member posters have their email address duplicated in the Display Name field of the From they post with.
This causes their full
Mark,
An admittedly unusual situation, but I've a group where many non-member posters have their email address duplicated in the Display Name field of the From they post with.
This causes their full
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#24027
·
|
|
moderated
Create a setting "edits moderated" as compromise to "disable editing"
#suggestion
Currently, the only option a group has for controlling edits is to completely disable editing. The suggestion is to create another option, "edits moderated," that causes message edits to go through
Currently, the only option a group has for controlling edits is to completely disable editing. The suggestion is to create another option, "edits moderated," that causes message edits to go through
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24026
·
|
|
moderated
When a message edit comes through pending, allow editing of the "reason"
#suggestion
If you or someone edits a message and the edit comes through pending (due to some moderation setting), it's possible to edit the content from within the pending queue, but not the "reason." You can
If you or someone edits a message and the edit comes through pending (due to some moderation setting), it's possible to edit the content from within the pending queue, but not the "reason." You can
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24025
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
So Reply to OP may not be completely intuitive either as the FUNCTION of the Private button IS what I'm after. It just needs to be clear what its for and IMO needs to be clear its a reply function at
So Reply to OP may not be completely intuitive either as the FUNCTION of the Private button IS what I'm after. It just needs to be clear what its for and IMO needs to be clear its a reply function at
|
By
outlawmws
·
#24024
·
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
INTERNAL: Better tracking of which mechanism a user is added to the system, to aid in spotting shenanigans.
SYSADMIN: Added a lot of storage to increase the amount of
Changes to the site this week:
INTERNAL: Better tracking of which mechanism a user is added to the system, to aid in spotting shenanigans.
SYSADMIN: Added a lot of storage to increase the amount of
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#24023
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
Haha. I don’t mind, either. I think it actually may have been your post about the “catching up” that pinged my brain this morning. 😊
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
Haha. I don’t mind, either. I think it actually may have been your post about the “catching up” that pinged my brain this morning. 😊
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author,
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#24022
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Reply to Options
#suggestion
J,
>>> Correct, I just sent that in as a bug/suggestion. Havent seen it come thru yet.
Yours did come through; mine said the same thing pretty-much (except I tagged it as #bug) and probably came
J,
>>> Correct, I just sent that in as a bug/suggestion. Havent seen it come thru yet.
Yours did come through; mine said the same thing pretty-much (except I tagged it as #bug) and probably came
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#24021
·
|