Actually I just checked and it's 554. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Chris noted the following: ""Our" Monthly Message goes out as a Special Notice on the 1st of every month and the outcome was that about 72 new bouncers have been listed. I haven't checked every one

Possibly. But coincidentally, (a) this has never happened in my group before; (b) the logging behavior occurred immediately after the bug fix; (c) the member is on special notices only; and (d) here

I'd bet that none of them were 554 codes which is the one (#bug) described in this topic. My guess is that the first couple of bounces were either indeterminate hard bounces or soft bounces. That

It's the 4 log entries: Feb 1 at 5:30 a.m., 10:09 a.m., and 2:55 p.m., and today at 3:45 p.m. I'm expecting more tomorrow. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy

Not sure I understand. Did you not expect the person to be bouncing? Or was it the fact that there were 4 bouncing log entries? Thanks, Mark

Correction: there were four in total for this member, including the one today. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we

Not so sure about this "fix." In my group there were no less than FOUR "xyz is bouncing via system" log entries on Feb 1 for the same member, who is subscribed via special notices, and just for good

Moving this idea over from the GMF thread Calendar Question: "Public can view, Subscribers can view and edit" clarification Simply put, allow both the Creator and Organizer(s) edit Calendar

As rather suggested by Mark's "fixed" hashtag this problem has been, er, fixed. "Our" Monthly Message goes out as a Special Notice on the 1st of every month and the outcome was that about 72 new

Ok, now I get it. These people are using their email address for the name portion of their email address. Pretty we’d. I guess I can now see how that qualifies (sort of) as an example of

Hi J, I did a little test - configured an email account and put the email address also into the „name“ field (in Apple mail on iPad actually). Then I sent a message to Groups.io to a group that

Shal, I think that's correct and that my statement that groups.io harvests and uses the email address as the display name is wrong. I think it harvests, as you reference here, the name that comes

That part is true. Also, I checked and we have 5 Suzannes, 10 Susans, and 5 Sues. :-) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours,

Exactly. But the display name IS the email address (since groups. io harvests it from any email sent to the group) or blank (if they've sent no email yet) until the member or a mod changes it. And I

J, It seems highly unlikely that even two of them have Suzanne as the user part of their actual email address. That would mean that they have unique email domains. On the other hand ten given names

i am having the same problem and it is not fixed. If you go to posted i just see blanks after i delete and the blanks stay there. I cant see to organize it in posting and that is what my members look

What if the Display Name for a non-member simply read "Non-member"? If anyone wants to start actively participating in the group, they can join and you can have control over their Display Name.

Oh, so you can't change their Display Name because they have no member record. Interesting situation. However, I don't know if the masking rule for message bodies should generally be applied to

p.s. "P" members' edits would, of course, bypass the moderation. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be