"something like "this group will start functioning februari 30th, 18.45 UTC" Nice idea, but why limit it to SUBgroups? groetjes, Ronaldo

Oops, looks like it's Portuguese, not Italian. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

I'm not sure what kind of bug this is, but it seems that at least in the one case attached here, a reply via email by someone in Italy attached the preface "RES", instead of "Re:," which caused lack

Yes and there's some similar funkiness with merging and splitting. The titles are not kept in synch. Noticed this a long time ago, but since I no longer merge or split, including rarely changing a

Hi Mark, I noticed that two of the new topics (69961750, 69961762) you copy-created over from Canny have duplicate threads already existing in beta. (I know because I'm the perpetrator of both the

It's not a terrible idea, but I don't think Mark would necessarily get the best product from that. The features he's thinking about at any given time are unlikely the ones where people have a great

Mo, I think this is a good suggestion. Perhaps one way to solicit suggestions for a specific features would be for Mark to create a message asking for input on that subject, example: "Looking for

Greetings, Short version: Here's a glitch, in short, at least in beta, when one replies through the online interface to an existing message which had its original subject altered by removing a

Sorry, my bad. They are still there. I missed the "More" feature. -- Gerald

Mark, The list of hashtags seems to be smaller than it was previously. Were #misc and #fixed and perhaps others deleted intentionally? #misc I am OK with losing as it is the same as no hashtag. --

I have a different idea. Mark what is your vision for groups.io or are you at the stage of needing input for new tech? Maybe instead of a free for all we concentrate on one area of the system at a

UPDATE: I followed a new beta topic today (https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/new_group_charter/69937945) and the auto-generated catch-up emails came in mixed, some did have the [beta] tag, others

Hello Currently, if you want to read messages via the web site, you can either use non-expanded view (which shows only a very short preview of each message, without line breaks) or expanded view,

Well, if you could implement a search feature in GIO that allows users to limit their search to (a) the subject line and (b) the first message in a topic, you can reduce much of the reposting of

But isn't that more analogous to beta itself? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

I think this effectively just kicks the can down the road. You, Mark, are the ultimate decider on whether a suggestion gets submitted. You have the power right now, since new topics are moderated,

The sub-group sounds like a good idea - we have working groups in our organisation to facilitate exactly this, which is what your unmoderated sub-group would effectively be. kind

Hi All, Ken in https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/23853 mentioned something I've been thinking about. Right now, proposing a #suggestion is a free-for-all. Duplicate suggestions appear often.

Especially should be allowed if the genuinely held reservations have to do with concern for the product as a whole, rather than a personal desire or dislike, respectively, for a suggested feature.

I disagree. Let us have a little personality here! You could limit the number of lines in a signature as an optional group setting (something I suggested here long ago, actually.) That could cut down